X must prove that it was not neglected when removing CSAM from its location

X is not outside the hook, but when it comes to an important legal status about the content of sexual assault on children on its platform. On Friday, the department’s judge from the American Court of Appeal spent on X Corp. To again face allegations that he was neglected to drop the content of the sexual assault on children and had no effective infrastructure to report these crimes.

This ruling Judge Daniel Forest is the latest step in a lawsuit filed in 2021 against Twitter, before that It was renamed to x. The lawsuit is listed by two minor boys as prosecutors and alleged Twitter, now X, “she performed slowly to reports about, and did not immediately remove her from the platform, the porn content by the trader has forced the prosecutors to production.”

A previous decision with a committee of three judges unanimously decided that X was legally fortified thanks Section 230 From the law of decent communication, which provides widespread protection for online platforms from the content published by its users. This last decision of Judge Forest is consistent with parts of the previous ruling, but the allegations that X was negligence in this case and it must defend itself against the claim allegations that the platform makes it “very difficult to report pornography for children that are published on Twitter.”

The case revolves around about 13 years old and a 14 -year -old boy who was deceived by online sex to send sexual explicit photos, according to the lawsuit. The illegal content was published on Twitter, and the 13 -year -old presented a report against him through the interface to report Twitter content, as detailed in the case. The boy’s mother also presented a report, and she received nothing but an automatic response, and she had to follow up before receiving a response that Twitter did not find any violations of politics and would not take more measures, according to the lawsuit. The lawsuit claimed that Twitter removed the publication in the end after nine days of the initial report, suspended the poster account and informed the content to the National Center for missing children and exploiters, which is required by federal law. The lawsuit can put a major precedent on how social media platforms work, especially if it reaches supreme courtBut X will first have to defend itself against these allegations again in the provincial court thanks to this last decision.