With the Starship 10 championship, SpaceX gave priority to flexibility for perfection

Spacex has long marketed Starship as a fully reusable missile insignia and a speed designed to connect thousands of pounds from goods to Mars and make life multi -life. But widespread reuse means a spacecraft that can tolerate accidents and errors, so that one failure does not clarify the end of the task.

the 10 test trip On Tuesday evening, Spacex’s focus on tolerance with errors. In post -trips update, Spacex said the test stressed the “boundaries of vehicle capabilities”. Understanding these edges will be extremely important for the company’s plans to ultimately use Starship to launch Starlink Satellites, commercial load, and eventually astronauts.

When the huge stars missile set out on the tenth test on Tuesday evening, Spacex made more than new features. I intentionally submitted several errors to test the heat shield, repeat the payment, and hide the Raptor engine.

The heat shield is among the most difficult engineering challenges facing Spacex. Elon Musk also admitted At x on May 2024Reuscopper tropical heat shield is the “largest remaining problem” for 100 % reuse of missiles.

The upper stomach, which is also called the oral vehicle, is covered with thousands of hexagonal ceramic and metal tiles, which make up the heat shield.

Flight 10 revolves around learning the amount of damage that the ship could accept and survive when it passes the heating in the atmosphere. During the tenth test, the engineers deliberately removed the tiles from some sections of the ship, and experienced a new type of cooled tiles actively, to collect data in the real world and refine the designs.

Colombia Signed the Space Satisfaction presented an unwanted lesson in the weakness of the thermal shield in 2003. It struck a piece of foam thermal tile on the left wing of Colombia, a decisive error during the takeoff that ended up killing all the seven astronauts on the plane when re -entering.

After 22 years, Spacex focuses on setting performance even in the worst scenarios. If post -aviation data shows that the ship remained among the expected temperature margins, it pushes the company forward towards the ultimate goal of declining in the stage straight to reuse and reuse.

Repeating to pay the test was placed. The composition of heavy heavy landing burning appears to be a rehearsal of engine failure. The engineers intentionally disrupted one of the three central Raptor engines during the final stage of the burning and used the backup engine in place. It was a successful rehearsal for an engine event.

Finally, Spacex reported about the RAPTOR engine, which was described at the time at all as Spacex second time has withdrawn this. The reliable restarting of the engine will be necessary for the deep space tasks, the transfer of motivation, and perhaps some of the useful load spreading tasks.

NASA’s Artemis program depends on developing a thermal shield that escapes from re -entering, and a ship that can reliably rise to orbit, in order to safely connect astronauts to the moon. The agency gave Spacex a little more than $ 4 billion for a version of the spacecraft that could land on the moon; The first moon is currently scheduled to decline in mid -2017.

NASA is calibrating the risks differently according to the mission file, with a higher degree of risk acceptance of unintended service missions and a very low risk to the vehicle covered. The agency determines the quantitative safety goals that must be shown by testing aviation and flight data before putting astronauts on a new missile. These levels do not change for the stars just because they are a larger missile, but this means more potential failure.

These experiments indicate that Spacex is tested as these criteria are in mind. The company will make many other changes with the next version of Starship, named Block 3, including the high RAPTOR engine, upgrades to panels, updates to aviation, direction, transportation and control systems.

The next step is to translate flight 10 into promotions for future devices to approach routine and days that, when, when, Also depicted musk“Jacket jacket more than 24 times in 24 hours.”