Will “Worksloop”, which was created from artificial intelligence, blames the lack of gains in productivity?

Hello, it’s Beatrice Nolan here, Jeremy Khan, who is outside today. I spent a lot of time recently thinking about the promise of productivity that artificial intelligence fed at the workplace, especially after that Which – which Massachusetts Institute of Technology reportI found that the majority of companies’ flying of artificial intelligence were not up to the level of this promise.

Last year, the number of companies that manage the entire workflow Artificial intelligence has doubledWhile the public workplace Using also doubled Since 2023, despite the dramatic absorption of technology, a rear study from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology is still that 95 % of organizations that build artificial intelligence have not witnessed a clear return on these investments.

Some investors are already tense about “You have a bubble,” Choose the report as an accusation of artificial intelligence as a whole. However, as Jeremy indicated at that time, The report has actually blaming the lack of productivity on the “learning gap” – people and institutions that do not understand how to properly use artificial intelligence tools – more than a problem in performing the technology itself.

New research indicates an alternative interpretation: that the presence of artificial intelligence in the workplace may actually lead to low productivity. According to Modern and continuous survey of better laboratories In cooperation with Stanford University Social Media Laboratory, some employees use artificial intelligence to create a low -voltage Worksloop, which takes a long time to clean.

Worksloop, a term formulated by the researchers and is based on “SLOP”, which was created from artificial intelligence that you can find in blocking your social media extracts, as “the work content created from artificial intelligence that denies as a good work, but lacks the material to apply for a specific task.”

The presence of Worksloop itself is not new. There are already reports that it creates its own appropriate economy, with some Independent workers report They are appointed – often in Installment rates– To clean the dirty version, the symbol, and the embarrassing images that artificial intelligence leaves.

What the new research shows is just the extent of the widespread Worksloop within the organizations.

The cost of work resulting from artificial intelligence

Of the 1150 American employees included in the survey, 40 % said they faced Worksloop last month. Less than half of this low -quality work is exchanged between colleagues at the same level. He said 18 % of the respondents that they had received it from direct reports, while 16 % of managers or people said the highest company ladder.

The employees said that, out of speeding up the workflow, this slope created from artificial intelligence has created more works. According to the research, employees spent two hours shy in dealing with each part of the work created by artificial intelligence. Based on the salaries that have been spent and self -salaries, the researchers, Workslo may cost individual employees $ 186 a month. For an organization that includes 10,000 workers, this may mean more than $ 9 million a year of lost productivity.

Accidents also have morale costs, as the employees have reported their inconvenience, confusion and insult when they receive low quality work. According to the research, half of the surveyed people watched their colleagues who produced Worksloop as less creative, ability and reliability. They were also considered less worthy of confidence and less intelligent.

In general, employees receiving low -quality business were less inclined to cooperate with their colleagues.

Why happens

There is a level of AI-SLOP is a natural secondary result of the current artificial intelligence models. LLMS is designed to create the content quickly by predicting the word or the next style, not to ensure originality or insight with a significant. Models also hallucinations, which can affect the accuracy of the work created by artificial intelligence.

But the new research indicates a lack of employee understanding – or care – when it comes to using artificial intelligence tools. Artificial intelligence organizations often confirm from top to the bottom of the experiment without providing clear guidelines. Although experimentation is part of the adoption of a new technology, encouraging the use of artificial intelligence without a direction can pressure employees to produce production even when it is inappropriate.

So how do companies divide the Workslop wave? Researchers’ suggestions include more guidelines for when and how artificial intelligence should be used, encourage purposeful use, instead of focusing shortcuts, technology, enhancing cooperation and increasing transparency among employees on the use of artificial intelligence. Without these measures, companies rush to adopt the risks of artificial intelligence in creating more efficiency.

However, here is more news of artificial intelligence.

Beatrice Nolan

[email protected]

Our wealth

“Every pilot Copilot stumbles in the pilot” – unless the companies balance in the balance of data security and innovation, the experts say – Sharon Goldman

Exclusively: Former Google DeepMind researchers secure a seed tour of $ 5 million to a new company to bring artificial intelligence to design the algorithm to the fans – Jeremy was

Trump fees can be strangled at $ 100,000 from H-1B Beatrice Nolan

How Sarah de Lagarde, who lost two sides of a train accident, uses artificial intelligence to promote new technology that can be accessed-including “Robe Robot Robb Arms” – Asha Mihata

Eye on the news of artificial intelligence

NVIDIA plans to invest a billion dollars in Openai. The hot pledge of $ 5 billion for previous competition Intel, is scheduled to invest Nvidia $ 100 billion in Openai. Under the partnership, NVIDIA will provide at least 10 GB of systems, with the first online Gigawatt in 2026. However, some investors warn of “circular” in the NVIDIA business strategy, as the company enhances the demand for AI chips through investing in startups such as Openai, which then uses funding to purchase more NVIDIA devices. You can read More here.

Experts invite Amnesty International “Red Airways”. More than 200 experts, including 10 experts in Nobel, artificial intelligence pioneers from Openai, Google DeepMind, Anthropor, and former world leaders, have called for international “red lines” to develop artificial intelligence by the end of 2026. The signatories warned that the “AI’s current path offered unbearable risks”, on the pretext that “an international agreement”. Experts have warned of risks such as engineering epidemics, collective unemployment, loss of human control over artificial intelligence, and urging an implemented global agreement. The statement of the United Nations General Assembly is done, you can read More here.

Artificial intelligence leaders weigh the new H-1B visa fees. Nvidia Jensen Huang and CEO of Openai Sam Altman participated in their ideas about new TRMP fees worth $ 100,000 H-1B after the sudden change sparked a wave of panic in Silicon Valley during the weekend. Heavy weights of artificial intelligence indicated their support for the high visa fees in the Trump administration during Interview with CNBC. “Happy to see President Trump is making his moves,” Huang said, while Al -Taman said that the financial incentives and simplifying the process “look good for me.” This step can restructure employment in the American technology sector, especially in the already recruited male talent group, which depends greatly on high skills visa holders, especially from India and China. You can Read more here.

Eye on artificial intelligence research

Google DeepMind Lasers in New Ai. DeepMind released version 3.0 from Frontier Saferty Framework on Monday. The update offers a new embarrassment level (CCL) It focused on “harmful manipulation”, which the company defined as “the models of Amnesty International with strong capabilities that can be offended to change beliefs and behaviors systematically and significantly in specific specific contexts over the interactions with the model, which leads to an additional expected additional damage.” The company also Its framework has expanded to address the potential risks of potential artificial intelligence models that resist to be closed by humans. Deepmind He also cited the risks of new imbalance of the model’s capabilities for an unveiled level in the levels of higher ability. To address these risks, the company says it runs new reviews, including human participants’ studies. You can read more Intuition here.

You have a calendar

6-10 October: world Amnesty International The week, Amsterdam

October 21-22: Teddy San Francisco.

10-13 November: The top of the web, Lisbon.

November 26-27: The world of artificial intelligence, London.

2-7 December: NeuPIPs, San Diego

December 8-9: Fortune Brainstorm Ai San Francisso. Apply to attendance here.

Brain food

Should artificial intelligence really be used for treatment? An increasing number of people resort to AI Chatbots to support mental health. It is easy to know the reason, Almost 1 in 4 people with Mental illness in the United States informs that treatment needs not to be met, and often due to cost, shame stigma, or lack of access. However, this practice is subject to increased scrutiny of the organizers after several cases of deadly accidents associated with people who rely on artificial intelligence robots during severe mental health struggles. In one case, the mother of a 29 -year -old woman who took her private life wrote New York Times Her daughter was tending to Chatgpt from Openai to obtain psychological support, but the advice gave the robot was insufficient to someone in her advanced depression. My father is also teenager Blame Ai Chatbots for encouragement Their children to end their lives. The American Psychological Association described the use of public chat programs for mental health to support a “dangerous direction” and urged federal organizers to implement guarantees against chat tools of artificial intelligence that constitute therapists, but the organizers are scrambling to keep pace with technology. You can read more about how this Impact on young people in particular here.