Why still Edgar Wright Anne Man

Marvel Cinematic University has become strong for nearly two decades. All this is due to the 2008 “Iron Man”. Directed by John Favrio, no one expected Robert Downey Junior in his capacity as Tony Stark to build an empire that led to more than $ 30 billion at the global box office, where Marvel Studios is approaching quickly in her fortieth feature film.

Although he might not get much credit, there was a moment in the summer of 2015 when it was clear that MCU had reached a certain temperature with the pioneers of the general cinema. That moment came when the director Biton Red hit. To a large extent, one of the biggest fluctuations that Marvel has taken in terms of giving the character of the lights that did not have an audience guaranteed by any means, has become a great success, as it achieved $ 519 million worldwide for a reasonable budget of $ 130 million.

This helped in Catapult Paul Rudd already to another level of international stars. He gave MCU another privilege to build on it, and made him a much larger outlet than before. However, 10 years were removed, despite the success of the movie, there is still the thumb of everything. This painful thumb is the exit Edgar Wright, who after making the classics of the beloved worship such as “Sean of the Mit” and “The Hot Zaghab”, He spent years developing a copy of “Ant-Man” that has not seen Noor today.

After a full decade, the Wright version of the film still looks like the largest missing chance in MCU, and she feels especially relevant today. Wright spent years working on “Ant-Man”, ” Even with the appearance of one of the oldest San Diego Comic Kon paintings To excite him on the character. It would have been withdrawn to other projects, such as “The World’s End” and “Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World”, and will fill the Marvel table with other projects, including everything from “Thor” to “Guardians of the Galaxy”.

Wright will be pulled into other projects, such as “The End of the World” and “Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World”, and the Marvel schedule will fill in other projects, including everything from “Thor” to “Guardians of the Galaxy”. All the time, Marvell Bright holds and raised his vision, as the director is waiting for patience in the wings.

Then everything went belly. Only months ago, production is scheduled to start, Wright and Marvel Studios separated ways of “creative differences”. Although there was little revealed that Wright’s text in the years followed, it is a very special way, and although it was good for them for a long time, Marvel Studios was not in the first outlet. It was more than the delivery and operation mode for many of the appointed managers, with rare exceptions like James Gon on “guardians”, but even had his frustration tending to the largest universe.

In the weeks that followed, Marvel set Reed, then he was famous for “Bing It on”, “ What seemed transparent like a “rental gun”. Credit where the credit is entitled, he played the ball Red and made the most of it, which made the movie that Kevin Fig and his partners wanted to do. It is difficult, at least on paper, the controversy against the results. Critics and the public loved it well enough, and that was a definition of anyone.

However, it is still difficult not to wonder what Wright would have been attending. This was something that was passionate about and hung for the best part of the contract. What was a very afraid miracle? Is not the goal of great success to bear the creative risks? Why not bet on the man who made one of the best zombies in all ages, for the sake of heaven? People went completely clear to see “Ant-Man” because they were sold on the MCU unit as a greater worry at that point. This could have been an opportunity to allow insight like Wright to do something, and to open all kinds of doors for the future.

Instead, Marvel Studios and Disney played safe.

To be clear, this is not badly talking about “Ant-Man” as it exists. It is a completely good film somewhere in the middle of the MCU package. What I say is that it is difficult not to see that Wright A) was interested in the project and took it, and B) that the Marvel Studios retracted it because it was not with its biggest vision.

This is where the “Film Universe” of everything has become an enemy of the individual film concerned. This also does not say anything about the attractiveness that Marvel Studios is stuck from Wright throughout those years, just to reduce relationships at the last minute. That remains, as children say, not great, brother.

It also does not help that The director of “The Avengers” Jos Widon praised He was saddened by the departure of the director from the project. It was not alone, and it is easy to know the reason. But a decade has been removed, and this moment has really taken a new meaning. It is not a secret that MCU has struggled in recent years, with films such as “Eternals”, “Black Widow”, “Quantumania”, “The Marvels”, “Captain America: Brave New World” and “Thunderbolts”, all of which struggle to upgrade until commercial expectations.

During this extension, the likes of “eternity” Chloe Zhao (“” Nouomand “) And the “miracle” director of Nia Dakosta (“” “” “” “” “” “” Candyman “) was to discover the difficult way What is like going to MCU with a vision. These visions were hacked during the operation, and the masses were greatly ignored in the final product. Was this happened to see if he tried to play the ball?

Here and now, it looks like a saving on Wright in favor of the safest option is to chase MCU. The things that were really clicked were either huge events such as “Spider-Man: No Way Home” or things with clear vision, such as “Shang-Ci”. It seems to be safe to hurt me (or at least not help) MCU. In some respects, it seems to be “safely operating so that we do not risk the mind of the public”. The mentality of its roots is due to this main decision 10 years ago.

Hope is that this Marvel Studios realizes this and can tend to tend to more films that the Creator drives in the coming years, instead of keeping their hands in 10 and 2 until the car is running out of the gas.