Why should we listen to them in India?

Zoho Saridhar Fembo founded a punk criticism in the academic economy, doubted its influence on the path of politics in India and attracting a direct line between the American industrial and economic decline in Nobel. In a post on X, VEMBU challenged the intellectual dependence of India on Western economic thought, warning that doing this may come at the expense of national sovereignty and long -term prosperity.

“America won the Nobel Economic Awards with the destruction of American manufacturing,” Vimbo wrote. “Why should we listen to them in India?”

The observation was defended by a thread of the CEO of Stripe Patrick Colleson, who argued that in order to lead the United States in strategic sectors such as drones, robots, solar energy, batteries, and pharmaceutical preparations, it must “bite the bullet and win manufacturing in all areas.”

Vembu agreed – and took the argument more. “This is completely true for India as well,” he said, noting that advanced industrialization is not just an economic issue, but it is one of sovereignty, security and survival for a country from India.

With 23 million births annually, India cannot rely on trade and services alone. “Given our huge size, we cannot assume that we can circulate our way to prosperity, and small countries can do it. We have to be and invent our way to prosperity.”

He stressed that manufacturing provides deep scientific and technological development, and that the demographic advantage of India provides the necessary talents to lead multiple fields – if it invested wisely.

VEMBU also launched a direct attack on the benefit of the academic economy in forming the results of the real world. He said, “Patrick offers a soft criticism of the academic economy. I will be more severe,” he said. “Listening to academic economists in these matters is harmful to national wealth and luxury.”