Why Iran’s struggle raised new questions about the credibility of the International Atomic Energy Agency Israel Iran

Israel launched an unprecedented blow to the Iranian military and nuclear sites on June 13, a day after the IAEA Council (IAEA) was approved by a decision he says. Tehran was not complied with its commitment to the nuclear guarantee.

Although Israel did not use the decision of the United Nations Nuclear Energy Agency to justify the Iranian attack, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs welcomed the decision of the International Atomic Energy Agency, describing it as a “necessary and late step” that confirmed the “systematic systematic nuclear weapons program”.

The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Atomic Energy Organization condemned in a joint statement, describing it as “political motives”. The joint statement said that the decision “undermines the credibility and safety of the International Atomic Energy Agency.”

Tehran insists that its nuclear program is for civil purposes and that its facilities are monitored by the International Nuclear Energy Agency.

Here is what the International Atomic Energy Agency said about the Iranian nuclear gland earlier this month, and its criticisms against its previous actions.

Did the International Atomic Energy Agency believe that Iran was building nuclear weapons?

IAEA cannot fully evaluate Iranian nuclear energy programs, as Tehran stopped implementing the additional protocol in February 2021, which allowed the reinforced inspection rights of the International Atomic Energy Agency – including ongoing and continuous monitoring inspections.

Iran continued to comply with the comprehensive associations agreement for IAEA after 2021, which allowed the arrival of the declared nuclear sites in Iran (Natanz, Fordow, Bushehr), which also allowed routine monitoring and verifying the declared nuclear materials.

However, at a press event in Vienna on June 9, the Director General of the Warning Agency, Rafael Grouosi, said that Iran’s recent failure to comply with the reporting obligations “led to a significant decrease in the agency’s ability to verify whether the Iranian nuclear program was completely peacefully.”

During the meeting of the Board of Governors at the International Atomic Energy Agency (which occurred from 9 to 13 June), Groussi said that Iran “was not answered repeatedly … the agency’s questions” regarding the presence of human-made uranium molecules in three-locations, Marivan and Togozapad.

Grusi also described “Iran’s rapid accumulation in highly enriched uranium” as a “serious concern”, referring to 60 percent of pure uranium enrichment facilities by 6 percent on Fordo and Natanz.

In 2023, the International Atomic Energy Agency discovered 83.7 per cent of pure uranium molecules in Fordow – Near the 90 percent purity required to make an atomic bomb.

On June 12, one day before Israel’s attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, the International Atomic Energy Agency Council Decision passed Announcement that Tehran was penetrating its obligations other than spreading.

Hashem Ahlbara of the island, which was reported to Vienna on June 12, indicated that it was the first time in nearly 20 years that the International Atomic Energy Agency, which monitors the Iranian nuclear program, accused Tehran of violating its obligations other than spreading.

Last week, Grosso confirmed that the International Atomic Energy Agency did not find any evidence of the production of Iranian nuclear weapons.

in An interview with the island On June 19 /

He said: “We have not seen elements to allow us, as inspectors, by confirming the existence of a nuclear weapon that was being manufactured or produced somewhere in Iran.”

The United States Vice President JD Vance called the International Atomic Energy Agency’s decision to take a issue to take military action against Iran.

“They were found in a violation of their obligations other than spreading by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which is hardly a right -wing organization,” was published in X on June 17.

The US President ordered his army to invoke three Iranian sites on June 22 – a decision welcomed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who was claiming for decades that Iran was on the cusp of making nuclear weapons.

Trump claimed that the nuclear sites were “blocked” and that the Iranian nuclear program had been appointed for decades.

How did Iran respond?

On June 23, the National Security Committee of the Iranian Parliament approved the outline of the draft law designed to suspend Tehran’s cooperation with the United Nations Nuclear Control Agency.

Rezaei said, according to the draft law, the installation of surveillance cameras, which allows inspections, and reports to the International Atomic Energy Agency will not be suspended as long as the security of nuclear establishments is not guaranteed. Iran joined the International Atomic Energy Agency in 1959.

In particular, Rezaei said that Iran affirms its right, as a signature in 1968 on the United Nations Non -Proliferation Treaty (NPT), to develop nuclear technology for peaceful purposes, including uranium enrichment.

Parliament still has to approve the NPT draft of NPT in the plenary session.

Tehran has long complained that the treaty failed to protect it from the attack by a nuclear arsenal country, the United States, and another is widely believed to be Israel.

Moreover, the Iranian authorities claimed that Grusi is looking forward to becoming the following Secretary -General of the United Nations, and thus sacrificing the integrity of the International Nuclear Energy Agency by adopting a pro -Western speech to gain a personal Saleh.

On June 1, the head of the Iranian Atomic Energy Organization, Muhammad Islami, told State TV: “Raphael Grossi (he is paid his ambitions and a strong desire to become the Secretary -General of the United Nations, to obtain the approval of a few specific countries and agree to their goals.”

Is the controversy of the International Atomic Energy Agency skirt on the Fukushima disaster?

In June 2023, the Japanese government began to launch treated water, but it is still radioactive, from the destroyed Fukushima Dychi Nuclear Station in the Pacific Ocean.

The International Atomic Energy Agency gave the controversial plan the green light after a two -year review.

At that time, Grosso said that the agency’s safety review has concluded that the plan “is consistent with relevant international safety standards … (and) gradual discharges that are controlled for treated water to the sea will have a little radioactive effect on people and the environment.”

More than 1.3 million tons of water has accumulated in the Fukushima factory since a March 2011 tsunami Electricity and cooling systems at the power plant were destroyed and operated The worst nuclear disaster in the world since Cornobel.

The launch of water, which started in August 2023, faced fierce resistance from Japan’s neighbors Pacific Island countries As well as hunting and agriculture Societies in Fukushima and around itThat is afraid of ways to live.

Beijing, in particular, was a violent critic of the water drainage plan. In a statement following the report of the International Atomic Energy Agency in July 2023, the Chinese Foreign Ministry disrupted its “hasty launch”, claiming that it “failed to think completely from experts.”

Are there echoes for Iraq in the current debate about Iran?

For several observers, there.

In the period before the 2003 American invasion, the United States and the United Kingdom confirmed that Iraq possesses weapons of mass destruction (WMDS), including chemical weapons, as well as follow -up to the nuclear weapons program.

These allegations were essential in justifying military action in light of the argument that Iraq is an imminent threat to regional and global security.

Near the end of 2002, the International Atomic Energy Agency conducted several searches for Iraqi weapons programs.

In early 2003, they created the presence of high aluminum tubes in Iraq. In theory, it can be used to enrich uranium for use in a nuclear warhead.

Aluminum tubes have become the cornerstone of Iraq’s delegation to the Bush administration. As the only material evidence that the United States could wave, they have given credibility to the horrific images that President George W. Bush and his advisers have summoned.

Condoleezza Rice, US National Security Adviser, US National Security Adviser, in CNN on September 8, 2002, said that the tubes were “really suitable for nuclear weapons programs.”

For its part, the International Atomic Energy Agency refuted the theoretical that the tubes were heading to use in a nuclear program. After the invasion, extensive search operations did not find any WMD active programs in Iraq.