Why did Stephen Spielberg want to remove Easter eggs in the Jorani world?

Stephen Spielberg is almost responsible for creating a culture of American pop music in the 1980s as we know it. His business did not break commercial records and broke only new reasons for how to make movies, but identified the appearance and appearance of the eighties on the screen. It is too Each movie director has been affected in the past thirty years in one way or anotherSo it is difficult for a high -type movie to have the concept of not getting some inspiration from Spielberg, whether it is an adventurous movie that holds from “Raides of the Lost Ark”, or a science fiction family film holding “et” or a The creature feature takes the sermon from “Al -Jawrasi Park” Or “jaws”.

Reproduction, recovery, gestures, and explicit entertainment of Spielberg movies are common, but when it comes to the films in which Spielberg himself shares, it becomes great for the legendary director. At least, this is what Gareth Edwards witnessed when working on the “New World Guerrante”, which is the latest chapter in the privilege of major films only for dinosaurs.

In an interview with Vanity FairEdwards talked about how he loves Spielberg Referring to other film makers in his workHe completely hates quoting himself on the screen. After the release of an approximate collection of Spielberg, the Oscar -winning director had one big final note. “By the way, take all the gestures and signs to all previous Spielberg films and Easter eggs” Jurassic Park “.

According to Edwards, Spielberg had a good reason to be hesitant to refer to his own films. Edwards said, “It may seem like a snake eating its tail,” Edwards said. “I don’t want to do it if I am them. But – because I am not them, I admire, and I love their work, as well as the rest of the world, I feel (they) are the only people in the world who have a problem with this.”

It makes sense for Spielberg to avoid referring to his work, especially in sequences. Say what you want about the “missing world” (Danielle Ryan is the best movie “Jurassic Park”) But at least try to do different things instead of just copying the first one. As much as a “new birth” tries to distance the rest of the privilege, it ultimately ends largely like “The Lost World” and “Juerasic Park III” without a lot of the original idea that is not just a remix on an old idea.

Although Edwards agreed to follow the observations of Spielberg, he is still trying to save the largest possible number of references, or at least find a way to infiltrate anyway. Edwards added: “I think we have got the right balance in the end. I think it is just humility,” Edwards added.

Apparently, there was a completely different introduction sequence that was much more in the context of the first “Jurassic Park”, remembering the scene where the prey was delivered to their pen. The scene in “Rebirth” included the main women watching something big in the trees, but instead of the dinosaur, it was a bulldozer to build the laboratory that appears at the foreground. (Monkey/bulldozer bit was canceled, and the film jumps directly to the laboratory that was already built instead.

Another big note had Edwards To adhere to the scar and try to adhere to science. This was particularly useful when it came to one of the largest Honoring Spielberg, which is still in the movie: The sequence with Quetzalcoatlus in the Cliffside Temple. This is clear that this is the “lost sarcophagus invaders”, which was recognized by producer Frank Marshall immediately during filming. However, in the end, Spielberg allowed the scene to stay as it is, partly because David CoB was stood with Edwards. “One of the favorite David Koepp films is” Raides of the Lost Ark, “Edwards told Vanity Fair.