Why did George Lucas not kill any major stars war figures, according to Mark Hamil

It may seem sad to narrate this, but to mention everything clearly: George Lucas, in 1977, “Star War: Fourth Episode – New Hope” focuses on Luke Sky Walker (Mark Hamiel), a non -satisfied young man who hates his life on Tattoin in the Tatween. His presence is then boycotted by discovering a secret 3D series hidden inside the robot that his uncle bought recently. Holgram is Princess Leah (Carrie Fisher), the governor of the planet Aldian and the secret leader of the rebellion against the tyrant Empire in the galaxy. Before a long time ago, Luke finds himself joining the sage of the desert, who goes alongside Ben (Alec Guinness) and leaves his world on a satellite ship for an arduous festival named Han Solo (Harrison Ford), all in the hope of saving Lea and joining the rebellion itself.

Luke Wali and Han continued to form the original “Star Wars” film band, with Hamel, Fischer, and Ford in the end, returning their roles in a trilogy that concluded in 2019. In the original trilogy, of course, the three were still breathing in the end. This ancient cannot be said about Old Bin (also known as Obi One Kinopi) or the wicked Dartheyd (David Broz) and the emperor with the two bat (Ian MacDarramide).

It is easy to see why Lucas does not want to kill anyone in the movie “A New Hope”, which in itself is a relatively light rum that intends to remind us of the favorite science fiction series in the 1930s and Akira Kurosawa Samurai Adventures (such as “The Hidden Fortress”). In the two films that followed, on the other hand, the stories began to tend darker, and I felt as if life was actually in danger. Can Locke, Lea or Han be killed?

According to Hamel, there was no opportunity to happen. It seems that Lucas has once told the actor that everyone will be safe because the “Star Wars” is intended for children.

Readers must, of course, remember that Locke, a guardian and Han, did not die in the “Star War” films even after Lucas sold the privilege to Disney in 2012 and gave up all the creative control of a new team of writers and producers. Lucas’s idea was not killing his main characters (although he was still unclear whether he had thought about doing it when he was developing a trilogy of himself).

Talk to todayHowever, Hamil recalled the work on “Star Wars: Episode Vi – Return of the Jedi” for the year 1983 and a feeling that the personal Luke’s personal arc should lead to a more complex moral conflict. The “Star Wars” concession, after all, happens in a world Completely binding on the living cosmic power is called power, well, strengthAnd that individuals can benefit from, allowing them to use the forces fueled by righteousness (light side) or selfish (dark side). As Hamil saw, Luke should have stood on the threshold of the dark side in “Jaidi’s return”, after he was cut off from his father, the man he learned only Darther Vader. Hamil expressed his ideas to Lucas, who was immediately called an exchange that narrates the actor as follows:

When I complain about things – on the third, I said: “Look has lost his hand, and he has black glove, shouldn’t it be a Boki struggling with the shift to the dark side? “Marc said,” It is for children. “That is why he will never think about killing any of the main characters.

Of course, Lucas eventually started killing characters By the time when “Star Wars: Third Episode” for the year 2005, the revenge against the seats “achieved, That witnessed the heroic Senator Badmi Amidala (Natalie Portman) – Luke Laka Leah – dies at birth. But this film, which is disgusting, was a tragedy about the first moral fall of Darath Vader and its development from the noble Anakin Sky Walker (Hayden Christine) to the Seth evil warrior. In a story like this, it may have been appropriate for one of the main (newer) characters to die.