Why did Billy Bob Thornton not like Landman again after western stirring

If you have seen “Sling Blade”, the 1996 guidance feature for the first time, Billy Bob Thornton, you know that the man is not just a great actor but a good writer and director, too (his first scenario “wasOne false step, “a forgotten jewel from dust dustStarring Bill Pakston and himself). “Sling Blade” is the old, smart and sensitive school-it’s a very few films. Today it cannot be for several reasons (some legitimacy, some of which are doubtful), but at that time, Thornton received recognition that he deserves. He brought him an Academy Award nomination for the Best Actor, but most importantly, he won the Academy Award for Best Air Conditioner.

His professional life could not have been as a writer and director (in addition to being a busy actor) a better start. He was creative and rich, as he had his individual cinematic vision that had the ability to turn him into a kind of director, the actor who became Clint Eastwood in front of him. But as it often happens in Hollywood, his next movie (as a director) passed a lot of troubles and turmoil – which ended up making it from the box office – this type of Thornton lost the spark and directed only one movie in the next ten years. But who can blame him after performing an excellent adaptation to the classic Cormak McCarthy novel, “All the Beautiful Horses”, most of which were cut in the liberation of the Miramax head at the time, Harvey Winstein?

In the past, it is not surprising at all that Harvey Winstein can destroy many professions and people’s lives with the same ease as some of the films he produced. Unfortunately, “All The Pretty Horses”, written by Ted Tall, was one of those losses. It is clear that he poured his heart and soul in it, as he delivered the film at a hard time for two hours and 42 minutes, which Winstein objected to and cut it to less than two hours so that he could run two or three times more in other theaters, and exceeded it more than two hours. In a conversation Interview with the deadlineThornton participated in the amount of disappointment and sorrow that was for him, and he never got his original pieces of the feature of the audience. He said ,

“The audience may never know what this movie was. Matt Damon says to this day in its original form, perhaps his favorite movie in which he was at all. Daniel Laois made the original result. It is beautiful. Maybe the best result that I heard at all. The studio thought it was very scattered. If you saw the movie and heard this result, you will go well.

It was two hours and 42 minutes. This was my story. They cut it for an hour and 59 minutes. They cut the basic things. Somewhere in my storage unit, I got original pieces with Dan’s music. Roger Ebert used to say, you have to put this. And I said, I would like it. I don’t know how to wander around it. I don’t know what rights are. I don’t know anything. “

Although this may seem tremendous, the absolute truth that Thornton still has the original version is a kind of hope for which it dies. Since this indicates the existence of an opportunity … and on this day and this era, there may be an flow service ready to revive this long film competing in its initial form. Frankly, I am somewhat confusing because it was not actually done. The wonderful Matt Damon team, Penelope Cruz, Henry Thomas, Sam Shepard, and Robert Patrick in their days, Thornton’s director will be more than attractive to a specific audience – such as Paramount+when Drama muscles in ancient school such as “Yellowston” And epic Historical Westerners such as “1883” It flourished like anything else. On the willingness of God, we will one day see “all the beautiful horses” as it was intended, and honoring the original vision that Billy Bob Thornton dreams on the big screen.