Where is the United States in the world trying to deport migrants in the third country?

US President Donald Trump promised the voters that if he was elected for the second time, his administration will follow collective deportations for those who are not authorized to be in the country, and they seem to be looking far away in seeking to achieve this goal.

But the United States is now approaching the principles it has agreed to as a sign of international refugee treaties and its own legislation, says many of the organizations that defend refugees.

The principle of non -repetition, in particular, is a commitment not to return immigrants to countries of origin or third -party countries when their lives or freedom are threatened for the reasons for race, religion or nationality, For all the United NationsOr where they may be exposed to human rights violations.

These principles were interrogated in the courts where the United States dealt with large flows of immigrants on its borders. Previous administration He only won a small difference in the case of the Supreme Court Allow him to stop a program from Trump’s first term, as asylum seekers were sent from other countries to Mexico to wait for refugee claims in the United States.

The Trump administration has revived that plan, which is called Protocols to protect migrants, but refugee advocates say He is claimed to be kidnapped and attacksIncluding the alleged sexual assault of a young boy of El Salvador.

In some cases, the United States does not have expatriate agreements with the countries of origin for some immigrants, but it increases people to be increasingly expelled to third countries – without notice.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently said The goal was to expel “some of the most sad humans”, but it is clear from reporting that many deportees do not fit with this description.

Below is a look at some countries that cooperate with the United States, or are said in discussions with Washington.

certain

It is estimated that 200 immigrants, including 80 children, have been deported so far Costa Rica. Immigrants were sent to a rural camp in the Central American country, from Afghanistan, Russia, China, Pakistan, India and other places.

Costa Rica announced that most of the two deportees will get three -month permits for humanitarian reasons, during which they can seek asylum there or arrange ways to leave for another country.

The conditions that the country agreed with the White House were not transparent, according to the Tiko Times, the Tiko Times in the country.

President Rodrigo Chavez was explicit about the logical basis of cooperation: “We are helping the economically powerful brother on the north, who, if they imposed a tax in the free trade area, will win us.”

International Refugee Humanitarian Organization Arrangement “It seems that the Pro Quo deal to facilitate” facilitating human rights violations to avoid American punitive economic measures. “

At least on the surface, the Costa Rica government appears ready to protect migrants.

“If a person has a good fear of returning to their country, we will never return them,” we will never send them. “We will protect them.”

The Trump administration sent about 300 immigrants to Panama In February, with Some say they had no warning to the place they were going. Initially, they could not leave the Panama City Hotel, then they were It was transferred to a temporary facility at Daryn Gap.

As with Costa Rica, government officials said they are qualified to apply for temporary humanitarian permits to stay in Panama, though The American Embassy in Panama in a statement on May 6 She preached the fact that 81 of the group – from countries including Cameroon, Nepal and Bangladesh – was placed on a plane again, and it appears to be binding on their original countries.

Panama is an interesting situation in that An agreement was first concluded with the United States in 2024During Joe Biden, described as “the first attempt to finance deportation to a foreign country.”

The Central American country faced waves of immigrants crossing through the dangerous Daryn Gap, and Washington was looking to reduce these numbers. At that time, the experimental program was said to have cost $ 6 million, but the American embassy said in its statement mentioned above that it was providing about 14 million dollars for Panama.

A lot of attention has focused so far on the United States’ deportation of third -party citizens Salvador. Trump and the head of that country, Naeb Bokil, wandering in their ranking At the last White House meeting.

The Trump administration has made interpretations about the reason why a group of more than 230 Venzuel migrants had not been deported to an unfamiliar country, but they were shipped without criminal trials to one of the most reputable prisons in the world in El Salvador.

One of the Democratic legislators claimed the Trump administration El Salvador pays up to $ 15 millionJudges have questioned more than one case of mysterious allegations and kind evidence that some immigrants are members of a gang.

As mentioned, Mexico Once again, immigrants from other countries were received by the United States More than 5400 people have been transferred so far. “Most of them have decided to return to their countries,” President Claudia Shinbom said, but the situation of others is not clear.

president Guatemala NBC News said It was ready to take the citizens of the third country from the United States, but he did not expect “large numbers of people” in this category. It is not clear whether anything has been taken since his comments in February.

Other destinations reported

Reports appeared earlier this month of the real possibility of the United States, which sends some of the deportees to LibyaWith a federal judge interferes with a temporary block in those plans. The country has become a flash point over the past few years for its treatment of migrants from other African countries that were on the way to the European beaches or their return.

Human Rights Watch said in a statement that the possibility of cooperating with Libya in the arrangement of an immigrant was “Dysopian”.

Hanan Salah, Director of the Middle East and North Africa, Director General of the organization, said: “The poor treatment of migrants in Libya is bad, their detention centers, and refugees have no place to become protection.”

Olivier Nadhonghreh, Minister of Foreign Affairs RwandaIn early May, Associated Press confirmed that the talks were ongoing with the United States on a possible agreement to host the migrants who were deported, after the government media told that the talks were in the “early stage”.

Paul Kagami, which has long been facing Rwanda, does not face a real opposition to his re -election, as many human rights organizations accused his regime of detention or disappearance of political dissidents and enemies illegally.

The United States will not be the first country to consider Rwanda a destination for immigrants. The conservative government in Britain was ready to do so, Even redemposing the legislation After the UK Supreme Court said in a decision that Rwanda cannot be considered a third safe country. No migrants were finally sent, as the planned Labor Party canceled after winning the 2024 elections.

Are other governments seeking to compensate them by the United States in exchange for the receipt of immigrants? It is not clear, but vice president Equatorial Guinea He recently said on x Such discussions with the United States took place, an affirmation that has not been confirmed independently. The country is permanently high in the list of the international transparency of the most corrupt countries, and leads it The tallest flood in the world.

The Washington Post, citing the US government documents that it reviewed on May 6 that the White House urged Ukraine To accept an unspecified number of deportees from other countries. It was not clear that the Ukrainian government did not respond, and the Ministry of Internal Security did not respond to this position for comment.

Trump has regretted that hundreds of billions of dollars were spent in military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine under its administration after the invasion of Russia in early 2022. The White House under Trump’s leadership sought to favor, as the two countries recently agreed to a joint investment fund to take advantage of the metal resources of Ukraine.