What happens when another child is added?

Our obligations towards others can have a great impact on how we behave – even for children who try to prevent themselves from eating a snack on a delicious treatment now. Poilists’ support helped children pass the famous Stanford Marshmallow test, which tests whether the child can resist an attractive treatment for a long time to receive a better and better reward, according to a new study.

the study , Published May 7 Open Royal Society, science, I found that children are likely to wait for a greater reward if they have a friend who pledged to keep him more than they were alone. The results show that promises can be a strong effect on people’s behavior, echoing previous studies that found that explicit promises make children Less vulnerable to cheating and More vulnerable to saying the truth.

The original marshmallow test, which was conducted in Stanford in the 1970s, was somewhat simple and very kind. The tried put back or another in front of a child before leaving them alone in a room. The experiment told the child that if Al -Khatmi is still there when the tried, the child will get weak delicious foods. Follow -up studies have found that children who “passed” the marshmallow test by waiting for the tried to have better results later in life. But subsequent studies challenged these results, as they showed that children who were exposed to the smaller reward were more likely to attend homes and difficult conditions that may have made them less vulnerable to adults. Therefore, their relative success levels may reflect later in the life of the environment in which it grew up, not any fundamental characteristics.

In the new study, a team of researchers, including the psychologist Owen Wadington of Manchester University, sought to determine how interactions with others affect the child’s ability to wait for a better reward. The scientists wrote in the study: “Successful cooperation often depends on individuals who maintain the late gravity.” “This feeling of commitment can also increase the voltage, and thus increase cooperative success.”

The researchers conducted online experiments and paired each child with another child. New experiences were conducted with children between 5 to 6 years old and their parents. From their homes, one of the parents showed that their child is familiar treatment. The child was told that they would get a better treatment if and only if another child also waits for a larger treatment in the same conditions. The tried fully disturbed the “broken” takbeer link, which allowed the participants to see the other child but does not interact or communicate with them.

Participants were shown a video of the child who was paired. The other child promised either they will not eat a treatment or expressed uncertainty whether they can wait.

The study showed that when one child promised to crack, the other child waited for a longer period before taking treatment more than if his partner had expressed uncertainty. It turns out that promises can mean a lot, even for children. Compared to previous studies involved in the marshmallow test, this study “goes further to show that when the partner promises to wait for their treatment, children’s willingness to delay the satisfaction is greater than it was when the partner expresses uncertainty,” the authors wrote.

Younger children were more likely than the time than older children, although the difference was not statistically. The authors wrote that this may be because with age, “children face more broken promises and learn that the obligations are not always fulfilled.”

The results indicate that promises promote cooperation in children, echoing previous experiences in addiction research that friends’ systems can prevent relapses. But the authors warn that they may not apply to all children, as studies have been conducted mainly on healthy children in northern England. Whether these results apply to children through other cultures are not yet clear.

A simple promise looks a long way.