Weapons do not work without a single representative, according to director Zach Craigger

Photo of author

By [email protected]



huge Spoilers For “weapons”, they follow, because everything about this particular character is a huge spoiler – so if you don’t see “weapons” yet, return to this time another!

Anyone has a chance to see the movie “Weapons” by the director of horror, “Weapons”, who knows that among the very talented actors, there is the most prominent one … and she is the character who will imagine, as an inspiration for a million fashion in this Halloween. This honor belongs to the “Gladys Lily”, which you play Veteran actress (and Oscar candidate) Amy MadijanThat barely appears in the marketing of the movie – for a good reason, taking into account that it is the key to telling the entire movie.

Cregger, The Sketch Comedian, who turned to the writer and director behind this movie and “Barbarian” for the year 2022 Vanity Fair About the performance of Madijan, it was really nothing Negative to say about Madijan. “See, I am more than happy to sing Emmy’s praise in the press throughout the day,” Cryber explained. “She is incredible in this movie. Without it, the movie does not work. It saved me. It is only difficult to discuss her personality without entering the spoilers, so it is difficult.”

What Cryper is talking about is the fact that Glades Madijan is the reason that 17 children disappear from their family in the middle of the night in the sleeping town of Maybruck, Pennsylvania, because it is a witch that steals the forces of life. After invading the Laila family’s house and my parents of Yong Alex (Carrie Christopher) put in a horrific euphoria so that they could steal their lives (to treat a kind of mysterious diseases, or perhaps keep it alive after centuries), Gladys was established firmly as the film’s villain. Nevertheless, Madijan – from He should Get Oscar nomination for this role – Some deep human moments are pumped into creeping performance, at the end of the world.

“Amy is doing this amazing thing as it changes in this movie. You never feel that you have been suspended, except when Alex threaten the breakfast table,” Kriberger told the director. “Maybe we see it real, or perhaps this is weak.” Another moment that Cregger refers to is when Gladys asks, in need of more life, Alex to help her kidnap these 17 children, all of them in the third row. Glades says that if he does so, she will leave – giving Madijan another chance to turn the color. “Emmy looks very painful about the fact that he does not want her to stay at home,” says Crager. “You like,” Which – which The real for it? “

How did Cregger get a revered actress like Madigan to play the strange and most vibrant character in “weapons?” Here is what Vanity Fair told about the process of pouring the Madijan.



Source link

https://www.slashfilm.com/img/gallery/weapons-doesnt-work-without-one-actor-according-to-director-zach-cregger/l-intro-1755724868.jpg

Leave a Comment