“We expect to serve, pigs!” Jake Paul unleashes the lawyers after Shavez Junior’s victory

Jake Paul turns his victory after Chavez Junior into a complete legal scene. After improving his score to 12-1 with boring points, clear points defeated Julio Cesar Chavez Junior in Anaim, Paul did not remain patience for anyone called his ascension to a joke. Now he and his manager penetrate the threats of defamation – and it seems more desperate than dominant.

Paul – Chavez: Is Pierce Morgan in trouble?

TV host Peres Morgan launched two criticisms on X:

“I fought a better battle with Jake Ball on Thursday than the unconnected farce that occurred tonight.”
“The man who wears his pockets is a substitute for $$$$ – but he kills boxing with these boring bulls *** against the oldest fighters after their pride.”

A few days ago, Paul sat on Pierce Morgan not subject to control – only to describe the “fat **” anchor before he greatly finished the interview.

Jake Ball’s legal threats after Shavez Junior’s victory

“After years of allowing her to slip as just” hate being hated, “I asked my team to follow the strength of anyone who compensates for a lie in my boxing career. He expected the pigs to serve you,” Paul on social media.

Director Nakisa Bidarian accumulates in a more harsh language:

This claim is unfounded and irresponsible. The battle of last night against Chavez Junior was a 10 -round seizure, set by the California Sports Committee with official judges. No gradual / forgery – just hard work and legitimate victory. Otherwise, not only undermines the safety of this sport, but it is a defamation and leads to damage to MVP, Jake Paul and the committee. It is enough. We will explore all options, including legal procedures, to hold those who spread such deliberate and harmful lies.

Now even podcaster and bloggers sweat. Does the Paul team follow every tweet, article, and article that dares to question its legitimacy? They have warned against summons, deposits, and allegations of damage that can bury small outlets in legal fees.

Displacement exercises: what Paul must prove

Under the California Law, to prevail in the defamation suit, the plaintiff must clarify that the statement concerned:

1. Transfer a certain truth (not pure opinion)

2. What is wrong

3. It was published to others

4. Reputation

Since Jake Paul is a public figure, he also faces the criterion of “actual slag”-it must prove that critics either know that their statements were wrong or acted with a reckless ignorance of the fact that there is a heavy lift, and requires clear and continuous evidence that the defendants enjoyed serious doubts about their comments.

It is difficult to see this as anything other than public relations. Instead of leaving the punches, he talks, Paul shields his lawyer. Will this legal raid to silence critics or just amplify the scene? One thing is certain: Jake Ball’s battle in the ring may not be – but in the courtroom. “Al -Kahun”, think about yourselves.