“We are not bleeding in red …”: Anopam Mittal responds to the cruelty of Gwenca to the companies run by Shark Tank judges

The head of the RPG and billionaire Goenka Group speaking online after participating an explicit post on the financial losses reported by the companies owned by Shark Tank India.

After publishing it on X, Goenka praised the display as a platform for emerging projects owners, but raises with his admiration for a sharp confrontation indicating the iconic films.

“I enjoy #sharktankindia as a program, and I think it is a great platform for our emerging project owners,” Joinka wrote. He added with a touch of humor, “But whenever I think about sharks, I think about the jaws of the movie and bleeding!”

The Goenka Publication included a schedule that defines the financial losses of companies associated with sharks – pre -entrepreneurs such as Aman Gobta (boat), Peyush Bansal (Lenskart), AUPAM MITTAL (shaedi.com), Kunal Bahl (Snapdeal), Namita Thapar (Emcure Pharmaceuticals), Vineeta Singh (Sugar Cosmetics), and Amit Jain (Cardekho). Data, which drew an unexpected image, quickly ignited gossip online.

Anupam Mittal, the founder of Shaadi.com and one of the sharks, was not one to allow the mail to pass without a response. Metal responded to X, with acknowledgment of watching Gwnca, but skepticism about the accuracy of the data, saying: “I know that you meant it in the lawsuit, so with all the respect, sir, I think that his reaction appears to be superficial and biased and incomplete data.”

Metal added a brilliant development to his defense: “I am happy to learn from priests, but only to clarify, like you, the sharks do not bleed in red, and we bleed blue and for this reason we do what we do.”

The stock exchange hit a tendon with Internet users, which sparked social media discussions. Opinions ranged from estimating the efforts of sharks in promoting entrepreneurship to sharp criticism of their financial results.

Some users praised sharks, highlighting the risk of investing in startups. “Loss are part of the game. One of their users wrote:” They are risking to support innovative ideas. “Another added,” Why don’t you join Shark Tank? It will be amazing with your super intelligence. “

However, not everyone agreed. Criticism ranged from skepticism in judges ’qualifications to ridicule the presentation of the offer. “It is now like any other TV program – emotional stories, laughter, battles, and public financing less than advertising revenues,” said one of the users.

Goenka’s suggestions to take a seat in the Shark Tank panel flooded comments. Another user said, “Shark Tank India explains that the concept is very good … but the choice of judges is doubtful”, “Run the harsh tank new programs” – that the Indian needs your wisdom, “while another commented,” Shark Tank India that the concept is very good … but the choice of judges is doubtful. “