An American court handed over a sharp reprimand for President Donald Trump’s commercial policy on Wednesday, announcing that he had offended his authority and hit many of his definitions – at least at the present time.
There is still a share of commercial partners, including Canada: some tariffs specified on steel and aluminum in place, but at the present time, she was sweeping fees on the entire countries.
The order issued by the Manhattan -based American Commercial Court, which eliminates the Trump tariff by 10 percent in most countries and announcing the state of Ventanil’s emergency to impose tariff fees of 25 percent on many Canadian and Mexican goods.
The White House pledged to fight with each tool available. This means An immediate call Trump may turn to various legal weapons to fight his commercial wars.
However, this decision made history.
To a large extent, the biggest decision in the ages “
American courts tend to be confirmed to the presidents in commercial policy, but Trump tested its borders with a barrage of protectionist measures, unlike anything in modern history.
Investors are mocking US President Donald Trump’s threats, which are external tariff threats, describing it as a “Taco” trade-which is returning to “Trump always going out.” When asked about the term, Trump called it a bad question. Katie Simpson reports from CBC.
One of the American commercial lawyers described this as the most important legal defeat for the head of commercial policy for decades, with a possible exception Some setbacks in court To Richard Nixon.
“It is the biggest decision in the ages,” Scott Lincum told CBC News. “It is a very big problem. The only question is the time it takes.”
He expected repercussions on several fronts. The court said that the American constitution gives Congress an exclusive authority to regulate trade with other countries that have not been exceeded by the president’s emergency powers to protect the economy.
Trump has misrepresented the 1977 IEEPA Economic Forces Law (IEPA) to apply the fentanel tariff to Canada and Mexico, as well as its tariff around the world.
“We do not read IEPA to delegate an unlimited tariff authority for the president,” said 49 pages resolution. “The challenge (definitions) will be evacuated and its work will be operated permanently.”
The court gave Management 10 days To implement her request.
He rushed to get goods across the border
One of Lincicome’s predictions is that some countries will now feel urgent to negotiate customs tariff deals with Trump. Another prediction? It is expected that the goods will flow to the United States soon – especially on the borders of the land with Canada and Mexico – where the importers benefit from this temporary calm in Trump’s commercial wars, pending the Supreme Court decision.
“The statistics of June import will be wild,” said Lincum, Vice President of the General Economy at the Kato Institute, a Washington -based research center.

“Especially for Canadians, these things sit on the other side of the border. It will be like Falkerez trip Over the border.
That is, even if Trump wins the appeal or uses another legal tool, such as the 1974 trade law that allows temporary definitions for 150 days for less urgent issues.
The ruling came in a pair of lawsuits, one of whom was submitted by the Freedom Justice Center other than partisanship on behalf of five small American companies importing goods from countries targeted by duties and the other by 13 American states.
The companies, which range from a importer of wine and spirit in New York, to the Virginia -based educational group maker, said that the customs tariff will harm their ability to do business. At least five other legal challenges for pending definitions.
“Our laws are important”
The Oregon Prosecutor Dan Rivild, a democratic person who led his office a lawsuit for the states, called on Trump’s illegal tariff, reckless and economically destroyed.
“This ruling reaffirms that our laws are important, and that commercial decisions cannot be taken regarding the president’s whim,” Riveld said in a statement.

The White House promised to fight. Trump’s spokesman Kush Disai said that unfair foreign trade has created a history and continuous deficit, American societies, workers’ muscles and defense manufacturing.
“The non -elected judges do not decide how to properly address the state of national emergency,” he said.
“President Trump pledged to put America first, and the administration is obligated to use each of the executive arm to address this crisis.”
In imposing a customs tariff in early April, Trump described the commercial deficit as a national emergency that justifies the tariff that caused all imports by 10 percent on all imports, with the high rates of countries enjoyed by the United States, the largest commercial deficit, especially China.
Many of these definitions of the country were stopped after a week. The Trump administration said on May 12 it was too Reducing the most temporary definitions China should while working on a long -term trade deal. Both countries have agreed to reduce the definitions of each other for at least 90 days.
Trump’s tariff, respectively, was shocked, which he said aimed at restoring the ability of American manufacturing, on US financial markets.
The US dollar rose against both the Swiss franc, a safe haven for traditional currency, and Japanese yen after the court’s decision.

On Wednesday’s decision to the US Court of Appeal of the Federal Department in Washington, DC, may be appealed, and eventually the US Supreme Court.
Many trade experts in Washington said that the defeat indicates Trump’s attempts to negotiate with other countries, including Canada. They said that other countries may have a lower incentive to bargain.
“This decision is making the current negotiations to obtain an episode,” said commercial lawyer Simon Leicester. “Foreign governments will have to re -evaluate how they interact with Trump administration demands.”
US President Donald Trump says he will delay his 50 percent definition on imports from the European Union until July 9 after a weekend phone call between Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Lin.
Another commercial analyst in Washington said that the coming days will work.
“The administration is likely to be panic at the present time,” said Anu Manak, a fellow of the Foreign Relations Council.
“The foundation highlighted by all the negotiations they make is at risk, so there is no incentive for any commercial partner to continue negotiating with the United States until it becomes clear whether the customs tariff will be stopped, in fact, in 10 days.”
If Trump’s assistants, if the customs tariff stops for a longer period, Trump’s assistants will search for more targeted tools, such as section 232 used to punish certain sectors, as Trump did with steel and aluminum.
The bottom line, Manak said: Trump’s commercial policy has been unveiled not only “half bread”, but also pushed the boundaries of the presidential power away.
https://i.cbc.ca/1.7546552.1748476353!/fileImage/httpImage/image.JPG_gen/derivatives/16x9_1180/u-s-president-donald-trump-takes-questions-from-the-media.JPG?im=Resize%3D620
Source link