Peter Navarro, chief consultant at the White House for Trade and Manufacturing, joins “futures contracts on Sunday morning” to discuss the court’s ruling on President Donald Trump’s tariff, Russian oil trade in India, and the removal of federal reserve governor Lisa Cook and more.
The chief trade and manufacturing advisor, Peter Navarro, criticized the ruling of the Federal Appeal Court against the mutual definitions of President Donald Trump, describing it. “Party injustice weapons in their worst cases“ During the appearance of this week “Sunday, the future on Sunday morning“
“(You have) the politicians wearing a black wearing,” he said.
“You had six seven judges, Democrats, but you also had 12 blue states interfering against Trump.”
The seizure of Trump’s introductory authority towards the Supreme Court

Peter Navarro, the chief consultant of the White House for Trade and Manufacturing, speaks to the White House media members in Washington, DC, on Thursday, May 8, 2025. (Bonnie Cash/Upi/Bloomberg via Getty Images/Getty Images)
He insisted that the decision was a party in its essence, as Democratic appointed assistants lead a rule that could weaken American commercial protection.
Meanwhile, importers have been accused of trying to protect cheap Chinese goods while undermining the president’s business schedule.
But for the Trump administration, the dark cloud has a silver lining. Navarro pointed to what he called “a very strong opposition” in the decision of the Court of Appeal, which is believed to be submitted a clear road map as the administration as an appeal to the Supreme Court.
A tariff “Liberation Day” in Trump can collide with the Aqaba in court today. This is what to know

President Donald Trump speaks during a commercial declaration, “Make the wealthy America again” in the Roses Park on the White House on April 2, 2025, in Washington, DC. (Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images / Getty Images)
He said that this opposition is dealing with three critical issues: whether there is a national emergency, and whether the definitions are qualified as a list of imports and whether the majority demand that the definitions were permanent have any legal basis.
He insisted that the state of emergency was real, pointing to the death of fentanel and its increasing commercial impotence, and he argued that the customs tariffs are firm tools for regulating import. Upon working hours, Navarro retreated, saying that the administration has never claimed that the definitions would continue indefinitely and that it could fade if China and the drug cartridges stop to harm the Americans.
“The bottom line … a very good opposition provides a road map for the Supreme Court. We feel very optimistic,” he said.
“If we lose the case, President Trump On the right, it will be the end of the United States. “
Get Fox Business on the Go by clicking here
Gerald Storch, CEO of Storch Advisors, says the strong profits of Walmart show that it “won this game”, while the goal faces low sales, chaotic stores and driving disorder on “Varney & Co.”
Resolution 7-4 fell on Friday and allowed the definitions to stay in place until October 14. US Supreme Court.
In the case in this case, Trump’s legal attempt to use the Economic Forces Law (IEPA) – the emergency law in 1977 – was to age sharp import fees and impose an additional tariff on some commercial partners.
The Trump administration argued that the courts agreed to the use of President Richard Nixon emergency definitions in an economic crisis of 1971 that arose from the chaos that followed his decision to end a policy linking the US dollar to the price of gold, according to AP.
Louis Cassiano of Fox News Digital contributed to this report.

A container ship sailing from the port in Qingdao in the Eastern Shandong County on August 7, 2025. (St/AFP/Getty Images/Getty Images)
https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxbusiness.com/foxbusiness.com/content/uploads/2025/08/0/0/peter-navarro-speaking-outside.jpg?ve=1&tl=1
Source link