Trump penalties, sanctions, Judges of the International Criminal Court Donald Trump News

The administration of President Donald Trump has followed a threat to the penalties on International Criminal Court (ICC)Naming four judges accused of taking “illegal and baseless acts” against the United States and its allies.

On Thursday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the sanctions in a sharply specific written written statement.

“The International Criminal Court politicizes and calls on the lie of unrestricted discretionary authority to investigate the citizens of the United States and our allies,” Rubio wrote.

“This serious confirmation and abuse of power violates the sovereignty and national security of the United States and our allies, including Israel.”

Among the four judges were approved by Solomy Balung Bossa from Uganda, Lose Del Carmen Eibaanz Karansza from Peru, Rain Adeleid Sophie Alabini Gano from Benin and Huhler’s house from Slovenia.

As a result of the sanctions, the judges will see their property and origins in the United States banned. The US -based entities are also prohibited to engage in transactions with them, including “saving money, goods or services.”

The International Criminal Court soon issued a statement in response, saying that it is behind its judges and “denounces” the Trump administration’s decision.

“These measures are a phrase statement He said.

“Targeting those who work to accountability does nothing to help civilians trapped in the conflict. It only encourages those who think they can act without punishment.”

Who are the judges?

in Fact paperThe Foreign Ministry explained that Bossa and Ibanz Carranza were punished The investigation permit To the American forces in Afghanistan in 2020, during the first period of Trump as president.

Previously, the International Criminal Court prevented a request to investigate war crimes and alleged crimes against humanity in Afghanistan, where the United States was leading a slow war from 2001 to 2021.

But he reflected the path in the following year, as the Public Prosecutor’s request was granted an investigation into the American forces and members of the CIA for war crimes in “secret detention facilities” in Afghanistan and other places.

The court indicated that Afghanistan was a member of the Rome Law, which includes 125 countries where the International Criminal Court has a jurisdiction.

But the Trump administration at that time criticized the court’s decision, and described the International Criminal Court as a “political institution that denies a legal body.” It has long argued that the United States, which is not a party to the Rome Law, is outside the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.

Another country is not a member of the Rome Law, Israel, which used arguments similar to rejecting the strength of the International Criminal Court over its actions in Palestine.

The second husband of the judges named Alapini Gansou and Hohler – for their actions against Israeli leaders, according to the US State Department.

The United States is the oldest ally of Israel, as it was the first to realize the country in 1948. It has since provided strong support to Israel, including its ongoing war in Gaza, which killed an estimated 54,607 Palestinians so far.

Experts in American organizations and human rights compared the military campaign of Israel in Gaza with genocide, as reports of alleged human rights violations continued.

In November 2024, these accusations stimulated the International Criminal Court Issuing detention orders For Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Israeli Defense Secretary Yuof Galent, who were accused of war crimes in Gaza, including deliberate attacks on civilians.

According to Alapini Gansou and Hohler, he participated in those measures.

Did this happen before?

This is not the first time that the United States has exported restrictions on the ICC official since Trump returned to his post for a second term on January 20.

Soon after assuming his position, Trump released a wide Executive order The threat of anyone participating in the international criminal court investigations with the sanctions. Critics have warned that this overwhelming language can be crowded with the course of justice, for example by bending witnesses from applying evidence.

but Trump argued The last suspension asks Netanyahu and Callant requires such measures.

He also claimed that the United States and Israel were “prosperous democracies”, which “accurately adhere to the laws of war” and that the investigations of the International Criminal Court threatened the military individuals with “harassment, abuse and possible arrest.”

“This malicious behavior, in turn, threatens to violate the sovereignty of the United States and undermines the national security and foreign policy of the government of the United States and our allies, including Israel,” said the executive.

According to this, the United States approved the International Criminal Court Prosecutor Karim Khan, who submitted a petition for the court for arrest orders in favor of Netanyahu and Calant. This, in turn, is the slowest investigation into the actions of Israel in Gaza and Khan I moved away later From his role amid allegations of sexual misconduct.

But Trump has a history of opposing the International Criminal Court, and extends to his first term. In 2019, for example, Trump announced that his administration will prohibit or deny visas for international criminal court officials participating in the investigation of the American forces in Afghanistan.

Then, in 2020, penalties for the International Criminal Court Pato Benusouda and a court official named Faksu Machoko for their involvement in the investigation. These procedures were later canceled during the era of President Joe Biden.

However, critics warn that Trump’s actions can have severe long -term consequences for the International Criminal Court, which depends on its member states to implement orders such as arrest orders. The same court The name To end the threats.