Trump killed a major report on nature. They are trying to publish it anyway.

The draft was almost ready to be presented, due to less than a month. More than 150 scholars and other experts spent thousands of hours in the report, which is the first assessment of its kind of nature throughout the United States.

But President Trump ended this effort, and began under the administration of Biden, through the executive order. Therefore, on January 30, the project manager, an environmental scientist called Phil Levin, sent an email telling his team members that their work had stopped.

But it was not the only e -mail that I sent on that day.

“This work is very important for death,” Dr. Levin wrote in a separate email to the reports authors, this work from his personal account. “The country needs what we produce.”

Now the main experts who worked in the report, named Nature Resort, discover how to finish and publish it outside the government, according to interviews with nine prominent authors.

“There is a surprisingly unanimous consensus that we must continue to work,” said Howard Frumkin, an honorary professor of environmental science at the University of Washington University, who was leading a chapter on the effects of nature on human health and in good health. -being.

The study was aimed at measuring how the lands of the nation, life and wildlife were established, and how they were expected to change, and what this means for people.

Most of the 12 seasons were written by teams of dozens of specialists or so. While some of them are federal employees, the vast majority of authors came from outside the government – academic circles, non -profit groups and the private sector – and they were already volunteering their time. The authors said that most or all the teams were expecting to continue their work.

The first complete draft was to be canceled, when the researchers were informed that the project had been canceled, and some had almost finished their seasons and were simply polished. Others were racing against the deadline.

Rajag Banwar, a responsible and sustainable business professor at Oregon State University, was leading the separation of nature and economy, preparing for slices to present his department when he got the news. He said that the team that he recruited saw, and still believes that work is an invitation to help solve one of the problems of his most urgent generation, loss of nature and biological diversity.

Dr. Banwar said: “The reliance of the economy on nature,” a topic was explored in the separation of its 6,000 -word group, “its value, interpretation and lack of decrease has been reduced.”

However, efforts to publicize outside the government raised major questions under discussion. What is the best way to publish? How will the authors guarantee a review of rigor and restrictions? Who is their target audience? Since federal employees will not be able to follow up, who will pay for some critical coordination roles? Who will provide the censorship that came from a federal guidance committee?

Perhaps the most difficult question: How can the report maintain the position and effect of government evaluation now as it will not be launched by the government?

“We just want to make sure that any product is already produced has the ability to move the needle in conversations, along the way from the dinner table in individual families to the Congress halls,” said Chris Field, director of the Woods Institute. The environment at Stanford University, which was leading the separation of nature and climate change.

Peter Lee, a professor of law at the University of California, Davis, who specializes in the intellectual property law and has not participated in this effort, said the legal issues related to the ownership of work should not be a problem.

“As a rule, government work is not subject to copyright,” said Mr. Lee.

The draft has been developed under the auspices of the American Global Change Research Program, the same federal group that oversees national climate assessments. However, while these reports were imposed by Congress, the evaluation of nature received power through an executive order issued by President Biden.

Leaving the project more at risk. She became one of a large number of environmental orders dating back to the Biden era, which was canceled on his first day in his post. Mr. Trump also has Frozen climate spendingHe started Withdrawing the United States from the main global agreement To address climate change and launch Attack on wind energy while seeking to expand fossil fuels.

By the end of January, the federal web page was reduced to assess the national nature.

“Nature supports our economy, health, welfare, national security, safety from fire and floods,” said Dr. Levin, the former director of the report. “The loss of national nature evaluation means that we are losing important information that we need to ensure that nature and people flourish.”

Dr. Levin refused to comment on the future of the report.

The Trump administration did not address the questions about the reason for canceling the voltage. But Anna Kelly, a White House spokeswoman, said that Mr. Trump “will launch the power capabilities in America” ​​and “at one time a warranty that the lands and water of our nation can be enjoyed for future generations.”

“The focus on environmental justice has made the evaluation more than the Trump administration’s goal, which has the Trump administration, which has the Trump administration, which has the Trump administration’s goal It attacked diversity, stocks and inclusion programs and Summary of workers from the Environmental Justice Office at the Environmental Protection Agency on leave.

Biodiversity, a variety of life on Earth, decreases faster than any time in human history, According to a global scientific evaluation of a teacher. The authors said that the national evaluation of nature was aimed at providing a more powerful picture of the state of play for the United States.

Daniel Enas, a professor participating in the Department of Forest Resources at the University of Minnesota and the main author to separate the drivers of change in nature, said her team felt the importance of working more than ever.

“It is a call for this reason to see this through,” said Dr. Enas. “We will not stop.”