Trump Environmental Protection Agency wants to pretend that greenhouse gases are not a threat to human health

In 2009, the “EPA) was able to” find “the United States Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. This scientific and legal design has eliminated that the gases aimed at the planet, such as carbon dioxide, are dangerous to human health and well -being. Now, the Trump administration has moved to cancel this discovery.

At Indiana on Tuesday, July 29, the director of the Environmental Protection Agency Li Zeldin revealed the agency’s proposal to cancel this conclusion. The Environmental Protection Agency claims that this step will save Americans with $ 54 billion of costs annually by eliminating all greenhouse gases standards for vehicles and engines, including Biden’s electric cars authorization. The decline is the most aggressive attempt by President Donald Trump to reveal federal restrictions on fossil fuels. Zeldeen called it “the largest editorial work in America’s history” on Tuesday, Associated Press Reports.

“With this suggestion, Trump suggests the 16 -year -old Environmental Protection Agency for uncertainty for American auto and consumers,” Trump suggests a 16 -year end of US auto manufacturers and consumers, “according to Agency. Release.

Scientists, climate advocates, environmental policy experts and former environmental protection agents warn that cancellation will have severe consequences for American health, luxury and climate. “Abandoning all the efforts made to address climate change is not in the interest of any person other than the fossil fuel industry, which has achieved trillion dollars over the past fifty years and showed that if this is not verified, he will follow profits at any cost, even if it destroys the American way of life.” statement.

Clean air law It requires The Environmental Protection Agency for regulating any air pollutor displays public health or luxury. In 2007, Supreme Court Ruling Warmical gases are subject to this mandate. Two years later, discovery of exposure determined The current and expected concentrations in the six gases of the main greenhouse gases “threaten public health and the welfare of current and future generations.” The “cause or contribution”, which was issued simultaneously to cars and engines as major sources of dangerous greenhouse gas emissions. These decisions are the legal basis of the Environmental Protection Agency for the regulation of planet pollution.

In the 16th years since the agency issued the discovery of exposure, scientists have found overwhelming evidence to show that greenhouse gases endangered public health and payment of global warming. Even in light of the organization of the Environmental Protection Agency, emissions led to fatal consequences of countless Americans, Driving The most frequent, intense and more severe weather events. Nevertheless, conservatives and some Republicans in Congress have argued that the real threat is excessive organization and hidden taxes.

In March, Zealin Declare The official reconsideration of discovering exposure on the basis that the Environmental Protection Agency failed to consider organizational repercussions in 2009. This step was part of a series of environmental declines aimed at eliminating 31 regulations on clean air, clean water, climate change, and more, according to the AP. Trump hiring Previous these procedures with an executive order one day to significantly expand the scope of environmental regulations, which also called for the Environmental Protection Agency a report on “legitimacy and a continuous application” to discover exposure.

Now, Zeldin aims to “retract the basis of $ 1 trillion in expensive regulations” by completely canceling the result, according to the edition of the Environmental Protection Agency. The suggestion must pass a long review process, including the general suspension, before completing it. Environmental groups have expressed strong opposition to the decision and pledged to combat it, including the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC).

Cristi Goldfus, CEO of NRDC, said in A. statement. “NRDC lawyers and scientists will not allow this without a fight. If the Environmental Protection Agency ends this illegal and ridiculous approach, we will see them in court.”