Trump dismissed the director of the Publishing Rights Office a day after the rubber -style musk plan was rejected to train artificial intelligence models, says Top Dem

Photo of author

By [email protected]



  • Representative Joe Morel denounced the removal of President Trump From Shira Perlmter as an unprecedented capacity, indicating that after a report it was found that artificial intelligence companies sometimes violate copyright laws. The major artificial intelligence companies such as Openai, which has been postponed, faces continuous lawsuits for unauthorized use of copyrights protected in their model training.

Senior Democrats The last shooting Director of the Copyright Office in the United States, Shira Bermeter, “unprecedented ugliness fist”.

In a press release, Representative Joe Morrell said: “The termination of Donald Trump to record copyright, Shira Berlipre, is a rude, unprecedented power without any legal basis. It is certainly not by chance to act less than a day after she rejected the efforts made by Elon Musk from the copyright crew.

He said in the statement: “Perlmturt is a patriot, and the period of its jurisdiction has pushed the copyright office to the twenty -first century by updating its operations in a comprehensive manner and setting global standards on the intersection of artificial intelligence and intellectual property,” adding that the procedure violates the Congress article, and risks trillions of trillion refrigerator in a state of chaos.

In the statement, Morel referred to a newly released draft of the Coptic Rights Office in the United States – the third part of a broader chain – proves the intersection of intellectual property and AI.

The document warns that artificial intelligence companies should not carry “fair use” automatically covering their training materials with copyright. However, it indicates that academic research and cash examination are permitted.

The report did not call for government intervention, but he noticed that the collective commercial use of publication rights – especially through unauthorized access – may exceed the limits of fair use.

The report said that “the commercial use of a vast work of publication -protected rights to produce expressive content competes with them in the current markets, especially when this is achieved through illegal access, exceeding the limits of fair use,” the report said.

Perlmturt has been in the role since October 2020, during the first Trump administration, and he advised Congress on copyright policy.

In a Facebook post during the weekend, the American Federation of Musicians He said This is the launch of Perlmter “will seriously harm the entire copyright community.”

White House representatives did not immediately respond to a request for comment from luck.

Ai Company publishing issues

Publishing rights issues have always been a thorn on the side of the leading AI companies, including Openai. The company is currently fighting many lawsuits that accuse it of violating copyright while training artificial intelligence models.

In December 2023, New York Times A lawsuit against Openai and MicrosoftAccusing Chatgpt training company of its articles without permission and claimed that the models are reproducing large parts of its content.

Earlier that year, Getty Images filed a lawsuit against AI – the company that is behind the stable proliferation – which is filled with more than 12 million protected pictures and identification data for the creation of AI’s ventilation tools.

Recently, many technology companies and industrial leaders have prompted the Trump administration to consider alleviating intellectual property restrictions for training data.

In the last “AI Action Plan”, Openai urged the United States government to record the protection of “fair use” to develop artificial intelligence, calling for a copyright strategy that protects “the ability of the American AI models to learn from copyrights.”

“America has many emerging companies from artificial intelligence, attracting a lot of investment, and has achieved a lot of research breaches to a large extent because the doctrine of just use enhances the development of artificial intelligence.”

Musk, who heads the artificial intelligence company behind Grok, also supported a more flexible approach to intellectual property.

In a post at X last month, Musk threw his weight behind a statement from Jack Dormyy, co -founder of twitter (Now x), he said, “Delete all IP law.” In a response, Musk said: “I agree.”

This story was originally shown on Fortune.com



https://fortune.com/img-assets/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/GettyImages-1189283774.jpg?resize=1200,600
Source link

Leave a Comment