Trump cannot deploy the National Guard in California to eliminate the law

A federal judge banned the president on Tuesday Donald Trump From the publication National Guard And other military forces in California to implement law enforcement procedures there, including arrest, searching for sites, and controlling crowds.

the to rule It came regarding suit In early June by California, it was presented by Trump’s challenge Defense Minister Beit HigsethPublishing the guard and the naval infantry to deal with the protests in Los Angeles on Trump administration enforcement policies.

Judge Charles Prayer He said that Trump’s deployment of thousands of National Guard forces and 700 naval infantry to Los Angeles “deliberately violated” federalism It can be accompanied by the verbWhich prevents American military forces from enforcing law locally.

Bayer commanded in The US Local Court in San Francisco It is limited to California, and the judge remained the decision until September 12 to give the Trump administration time to appeal.

The judge said that the Trump administration is not required to withdraw the 300 National Guard forces currently stationed in Los Angeles, “as it does not prevent the use of forces consistent with the Posse Comitaus law.” It can include guarding federal buildings.

But the decision comes at a time when Trump considered the deployment of the National Guard forces on other American cities to deal with the crime, including Auckland and San Francisco.

In mid -August, Trump was placed Washington Police Force, DC, under federal control The National Guard forces deployed in that city to address what it claims to be a problem of ravage.

On Tuesday, Trump said, at the points of sale on social media, that at least 54 people were shot in Chicago during the weekend, and they warned, “I will quickly solve the crime problem, just as I did in the capital.”

In his decision, Prayer warned that publishing operations were more guardian forces and military forces in other American cities will create “a national police force with the president as its president.”

“President Trump’s recent orders and public data related to the National Guard are raising serious concerns about whether the forces’ order to violate the Bossi Communos law is intended elsewhere in California,” the judge wrote.

The governor of the state, Gavin News, shines about the ruling on a social media post.

“Donald Trump loses again,” Newsom Books on X.

“The courts – the military in our streets and the army’s use against American citizens illegal, wrote.”

“Congress spoke clearly in 1878 when the Posse Comitaus law was prohibited from using the US military to implement local law.”

The judge wrote: “After about 140 years, the defendants – President Trump, Defense Minister Higseth, and the Ministry of Defense – deployed the National Guard and the Marine Corps to Los Angeles, apparently to suppress the rebellion and ensure the implementation of the Federal Immigration Law.”

“There were already protests in Los Angeles, and some individuals who participated in violence,” Brayer wrote.

“However, there was no rebellion, and the enforcement of the civil law was not able to respond to protests and law enforcement.”

Prayer said that the evidence presented during a trial for the lawsuit shows that the defendants “used armed soldiers (whose identity was often obscured by protective shields) and military vehicles to create a protective perimeter and block traffic, involve crowd control, and show a military presence in Los Angeles and around him.”

CNBC requested a comment on the ruling issued by the Ministry of Justice, which represented the Trump administration in the lawsuit.