In an increasingly fragmented world due to geopolitical lack of confidence, the race that is separated from the dominant currencies is gained. With the transformation of the border alliances and world trade becomes more broken, financial advisor Aksat Sriffastava sees a new competitor that appears on the monetary horizon: neutral net currencies. These independent financial systems are welcomed, which have not been linked to the impact of any one country, as potential temporary stores against inflation, manipulation and one -sided plays. Shrivastava believes that bitcoin may be the only real competitor.
Sherfastava, the founder of Hakish, highlighted the increasing call of pure neutral currencies in a world heading towards removing science. Sharing his point of view on X (Twitter previously), indicated that there is no confidence between world powers as an incentive.
“India does not trust the United States. The United States does not trust China. China does not trust India,” he wrote. “The important point is: with the world fraud, the two countries will move to something called neutral network currencies.”
He explained that the current system – where countries like China receive a wage in the US dollar for export – puts the two exporters in an unfavorable position. “This US dollar (i.e. its purchasing power can be reduced), if the United States is printing a lot from an American. For example. If the United States decides to print 20 % of each money offer in one year, actually: 20 % of the purchase power of the US dollar will disappear. China is as clear to the United States.”
Shrivastava has approved previous efforts to overcome the US dollar, indicating the BRICS proposals, the InR commercial settlement system, and the digital currencies of the Central Bank. “However, nothing works. Why? Because there is no stupid nation to replace the dollar with the dollar with Chinese dollar. With simple phrase: there are no neutral and neutral currencies.”
So what can fill the void? “The short answer is: gold, btc,” said.
He continued: “Why? Because this is not controlled by one country. The supply is somewhat fixed.” Gold, however, has its own issues. “Australia for EG has 12,000 million tons of gold, while we have 3000 million tons. Why do we agree on gold trading?”
As for Bitcoin, he argued that her limited supply and decentralized nature make it a unique candidate. “This is not a batch you must go and buy BTC.
https://akm-img-a-in.tosshub.com/businesstoday/images/story/202505/68275fefc4ac9-as-for-bitcoin–he-argued–its-limited-supply-and-decentralised-nature-make-it-a-unique-candidate-165522457-16×9.jpg
Source link