The worst movie in the Lord of the Rings, according to the spoiled tomatoes

Photo of author

By [email protected]







“The Lord of the Rings” is a beloved concession by critics and fans alike. Films on the middle ground tend to achieve good performance at the box office, Steraming Steam without a problemAnd the highest material is re -viewed by many. However, a recent addition to Cinematic Tolkienian Canon is officially classified on spoiled tomatoes as a scourge on the impressive “Lord of the Rings” record.

“Lord of the Rings: Rohrim War” He recorded a new “Lord of the Rings” privilege with a 48 % on the tomato scale. This is the decisive consensus (unlike the popcorn scale, which governs the audience’s responses), and he has a lot to say to the Warner Bruce project that had greatness but could not stick to the landing.

The “Rohirrim War” was the first invasion of the anime coordination of the average land film. The story takes place centuries before the “Sayyids of the Rings” and tells the story of the creation of a deep Helm. While it has great music and Several features of the veilIt is difficult for Fairweather fans to follow up on points He had a very low budget. Critics responded with an average class. To be fair, the fact that 48 % is a low privilege that talks about the popularity of Tolkin’s works It promises good for the next intermediate land projects. For context, let’s see how director Kenji Kamama anime compares some other cinematic classics.

How do you compare the Rohirrim War with the last Lord of rotten tomatoes?

Let’s start with a clear comparison. How do you accumulate the “Rohirrim War” against the original Peter Jackson trilogy? According to spoiled tomatoes, the results of the critic of the “episode’s fellowship”, “the two towers” and “the return of the king” are 92 %, 95 % and 94 %, respectively. It is a suitable trilogy of high degrees that reflects the clear aura that surrounds these iconic average emotions.

The “Hobbit” trilogy, which is also the Warner Bruce project, is the place where things begin to slip. “The Hobbit: The Hobbit: The Desolate of Smaug”, and “The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies” comes 64 %, 74 %, and 59 %, respectively, with the last piece of this Triple refers to Low Bros. That is, even the launch of “War of the Rohirrim” after a decade.

Another part of the direct work puzzle that you can think here is “Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power”. It is difficult to compare this because it comes from a different studio and is in the coordination of a serial flow. However, it is interesting comparison, as critics had a warm response to Prequel in the second era, which is 84 % after the season.

How do you compare the Rohirrrim War to other medium -moving land movies?

Live films such as “The Lord of the Rings”, “Hobbit” Trilogies and “The Rings of Power” are the only manifestations of the screen of the world of Tolkin. Over the years, other studios also attempted to capture the medium Earth’s magic in a moving form, especially in three full -length movies (some were made for a theatrical race, others for directing directly to the executive activation). When these people are treated in the equation, the race becomes more tight, even if the “Rohirrrim War” remains at the bottom of the critical classifications.

One of these moving counterparts is Rankin and Bass “The Hobbit”, which was released in 1977 and still maintains an impressive scale scale by 71 %. In 1978, Ralph Bakshi released his opinion on Tolkin in the form of “Lord of the Rings” (animation that told only part of her luxurious story). This project was the lowest level of adaptation before the “Rohirrrim War”, with a tomato score of 49 % (only one percent higher than new animation). Finally, there is the animation of Rankin and Bass “The Return of the King” from 1980, which gave critics 67 %. While the “Rohirrim War” technically, these previous projects are testimonies of the total low reception of the intermediate mobile media. In some sense, they put a modest precedent, and the new anime simply followed its example.

How do you compare the audience’s results in Lord of the Rings?

It is a known fact sometimes There are huge gaps between critics and the views of the publicAnd spoiled tomatoes have provided this with popcorn scale. This audience -based alternative tells a completely different story when it comes to medium earth movies and a broadcast series. Below are the audiences for all the 11 projects mentioned above from the top to the lowest:

  • “Fellowship”: 95 %
  • “The Bulling”: 95 %
  • “The Return of the King” (live action): 86 %
  • “The Hobbit: The Desolate of SMAG”: 85 %
  • “The Hobbit: Unexpected Journey”: 83 %
  • “Rohirrim War”: 82 %
  • “Al -Hubbit: the Battle of the Five Armies”: 74 %
  • “Animation): 65 %
  • “The Rings Master” (animation): 64 %
  • “Power Rings”: 49 %
  • “The Return of the King” (animation): 39 %

There are some interesting things that must be noticed here. First, the “Rohirrim War” jumps from second to the middle of the package with a score of 82 % of the audience. We also get the lowest total degree ever, with the Rankeen and Bass “The Return of the King” to the thirties. The “Power Rings” series is also approximately 84 % for 49 %. The only sense of consistency between the classification system is the unanimous truth that is that the original Peter Jackson trilogy, “The Lord of the Rangez”, remains at the top (although in a slightly different arrangement), as it continues to control the gold standard, and not only for the amendments Earth, but all fiction projects in the twenty -first century.





Source link

https://www.slashfilm.com/img/gallery/the-worst-movie-in-the-lord-of-the-rings-franchise-according-to-rotten-tomatoes/l-intro-1738012736.jpg

Leave a Comment