The White House offers misleading claims about the democratic opposition to the draft tax law Donald Trump News

In a news statement this week, items related to personal income tax at the White House in the “Great and Beautiful Bill”, a broad bill for spending and spending paid by US President Donald Trump, and claimed to be in opposing the legislation as a whole, the Democratic Party opposed each element separately within it.

Such tactics are misleading, especially since the White House was martyred in measures in the draft law that Democrats defended to improve the lives of Americans and not the reasons that Democrats have presented to oppose the “Great Great Bill”.

Here is to verify the facts when the White House claims that Democrats oppose it:

“They oppose the largest tax reduction in history, which will put an additional $ 5,000 in their pockets with a decrease in two percent of two numbers in their tax bills. In fact, Americans earn between $ 30,000 and $ 80,000 will pay about 15 % in taxes.”

The tax bill details have not been completed. In its current form, it will reduce taxes by 2.4 percent, for middle -income families, according to the analysis conducted by the tax policy center.

While it is a significant reduction in taxes, it is not the largest in history. This was under Ronald Reagan in 1981 by 2.9 percent.

It is precise that there is a percentage of two -digit in tax bills, at least in the direct term, with more than 11 percent with a little through all tax cutters. It is also true that people who earn between 30,000 and 80,000 dollars will pay 15 percent less, according to the non -party joint tax committee.

“They do not oppose any tax on tips for millions of Americans working in the service industry and are not a tax on additional work for law enforcement, nurses and more.”

This is only true in their opposition to the Trump tax bill.

Democrats and Republicans support the concept of no tax on advice. Donald Trump and Democratic Presidential candidate Kamala Harris pledged to do so on the campaign’s path. Democrats in the Senate supported the law of no tax on advice approved by the US Senate on May 20. The draft law, which is composed by Republican Senator Ted Cruz from Texas, was sponsored by prominent Democrats, including Jackie Rosen from Nevada and was unanimously approved.

“They oppose history Tax discounts For the elderly “

Outside the “Great Budget Bill”, Democrats in general did not oppose the tax cuts of the elderly. Many Democrats defended legislation that would expand the tax cuts of the elderly. California Democrat Jimmy Panetta participated in sponsoring a draft law led by Republicans that would increase the standard discount for adults over the age of 65 years of $ 4,000.

In 2024, Democrats in the House of Representatives presented “I won it, you keep it,” which would effectively eliminate taxes on the advantages of social security. The bill, however, was not made by the previous committee.

“They oppose increasing tax credit for the child.”

Once again, they oppose Trump’s “beautiful draft law”, not to object to the child’s tax credit.

In fact, Democrats have long pushed to expand tax credit for children. In April, Democrats of the Senate, including Rafael Warrenuk from Georgia and Michael Bennett from Colorado, presented legislation that would expand the tax credit for children. The bill will increase the tax credit, from $ 2000, where it currently stands, to $ 6,360 for new iron, $ 4,320 for children between the ages of one to six and $ 3,600 for children from six to 17 years, permanently.

While the “big beautiful bill” will increase the tax credit for children, it will do so by only $ 500. This temporary increase aims to continue until 2028 and will return to $ 2000 in 2029.

“They oppose new savings accounts for newborns and an opportunity for children throughout America to experience the complex growth miracle.”

In the “Great Grand Law”, Republicans in the House of Representatives presented new savings accounts for children. Accounts will include a $ 1,000 bulletin for every child born between January 1, 2025 and January 1, 2029.

Democrats were not only supportive of the idea of ​​savings for birth, but the prominent Democrats had already defended it.

In 2018, Korea Booker from New Jersey submitted the American Opportunity Accounts Act, which will also grant $ 1,000 to the new iron and up to $ 2000 in annual contributions. The draft law again re -submitted in 2023.

“They oppose expanded access to children’s care for the diligent American families.”

This looks false. The White House link refers to family credit and paid medical field, not access to child care. The Trump bill offers up to 12 weeks of paid leave for employees who worked annually and earn $ 57,600 or less.

While this gives parents more time at home, Democrats have focused on expanding the scope of child care, including before the global kindergarten. In 2023, the Republicans opposed a democratic plan to maintain open child care centers, struggling in the first days of Covid-19 epidemic.

“They oppose the security of the historical border to preserve their societies safe.”

Last year, Trump pressed the Republicans to vote against the party security security bill, a move that helped Trump’s chances of winning in November 2024. Democrats opposed Republicans’ plans to use the American military bases for detention immigrants, on the pretext that it is offended the use of the Ministry of Defense. Democrats have opposed a long border wall financing, including during the first period of Trump.

Stanford University analysis 2018 estimated that the border wall will reduce immigration by only 0.6 percent. Nevertheless, the “big beautiful bill” allocates more than 50 billion dollars to complete the walls of the wall and the marine, $ 45 billion to build and maintain detention centers, and $ 14 billion for transportation.

“They oppose expanded health savings accounts that give Americans more option and flexibility in how to spend their money.”

This is a type of correct. Democrats were not huge supporters of health savings accounts. The belief is that savings in the field of healthcare does not help the socially disadvantaged, which may not have financial resources to contribute to the accounts. Democrats also objected to other discounts Healthcare in the bill, including A possible $ 880 billion that can be cut from basic government programs such as Medicaid.

“They oppose the scholarships that enable Americans to choose education that suits the needs of their families.”

In the draft law, the White House mixes the long discussion about the choice of school with scholarships. Under the selection of schools, the funds allocated to the public schools system for private institutions, which Republicans, can allow students to obtain higher quality education.

Democrats opposed the choice of schools because it transformed money from public school systems, many of which are already suffering greatly. In Texas, Senator Ted Cruz pushed, for example, legislation that would expand the selection of schools, even with three out of four The educational areas in the state are unreasonableAccording to the Kinder Institute analysis.