The viral astronomer faces Gomboptron shame, but he evades the stroke of the court

the Coldplay The scandal of the ceremony that turned into the reputable respected CEO into “Jumbotron” is notorious astronomerSet social media.

However, in the eyes of the California law, its alleged relationship does not mean much.

While the Internet has issued the ruling, Family lawyer Richard Sullivan says the courts are working under a completely different group of rules.

When the stadium cameras were arrested for the Executive Director of Astronomy, Andy Peron, who was rising to a woman who was not his wife, he became the former data executive, a viral sense overnight.

It was called “Jumbotron”, and he went from the businessman to a warning story in seconds.

However, while the audience was quick to speculate on the settlement of divorce and nursery battles, Richard Sullivan He insists that the result will not be almost exciting.

“People often assume that fraud automatically affects the outcome of divorce, especially emotionally charged cases such as this,” Sullivan explained in an exclusive conversation with the explosion. “But California is a country of divorce without an obstacle. This means that the court does not care about the deception or why the marriage has ended. Betrayal may be unwanted morally, but it does not change the financial result.”

Although Andy’s reputation achieved great success in the stadium, Sullivan shows that the California law does not reward couples with greater betrayal.

For many, the idea that such public betrayal has no legal result that may be shocked. However, Sullivan emphasizes that in California, adultery is not a bargaining chip for divorce. The property department is still equal, marital support is based on profits and lifestyle, and not on the one who feels embarrassed by Gomboptron.

“Unless community funds are used to support this issue – such as travel or expensive gifts – the evaluation has no very few legal consequences,” Sullivan added. “It may be emotionally important. But in court, it is not related to the subject.”

This means that even if the wife of the “astronomical astronomical” gumputon decides to end the marriage, the result will follow a predictable formula.

Viral shame may be chased socially, but in the courtroom, the scandal is practically invisible.

Perhaps the most sensitive issue in any divorce is the nursery, but here, too, Sullivan pour cold water on exciting assumptions.

Unless parents ’actions are exposed to children directly or reflecting a steady neglect, family courts are not affected by the headlines of the newspaper.

“The bad referee during the concert is not enough to classify an inappropriate person,” says Sullivan. “Public embarrassment is painful, but the Family Court revolves around the structure and stability.”

As for the disgraceful executive authority, this means that his role as a father is likely to remain intact, even when his image collapses online.

California courts give priority to safety and consistency on general humiliation when determining custody.

In the end, while the “Jumbotron astronomer” has lost his face under the bright lights of the Coldly Play, Richard Sullivan explains one fact: in California, adultery may ignite gossip, but it rarely raises legal fire.

In the aftermath of the Camblay Kamb scandal, Megan, the wife of Indi Peron, changed her last on Facebook from Peron to Kerrigan, after which she deleted her account on the social media platform.

Megan also deleted one -time family photos from Andy with his two sons, including a long -distance journey photo and graduation celebration. Her decision to delete her account came after several people were immersed by comments on the scandal of Andy El -Ghud.

At the present time, it remains unknown if Megan will make a divorce from Andy, as she has not yet commented on the scandal publicly.