The United States Supreme Court to consider whether Trump could shoot a member of the Democratic FTC Courts News

The decision means that Rebecca Siloter is still prohibited from his position in the Federal Trade Committee at the present time.

The United States Supreme Court has agreed to take a case dealing with whether President Donald Trump could shoot a democratic member of the FBC despite the protection of Congress functions for this position.

The Supreme Court announced its decision on Monday, as Rebecca allowed actively to remain effective from her office at the Consumer Protection Agency and anti -monopoly during the case.

Recommended stories

List of 4 elementsThe end of the list

The court announced that it would hear arguments in the case in December.

Earlier this month, the Supreme Court was granted emergency Similarly, keep Trump’s ability to launch slaughter, if temporary.

Survival canceled a decision taken by the American boycott judge in the United States, Lauren Alejhan, who protected the FTC Commissioner from her rejection before the end of her mandate.

On September 8, senior judges John Roberts suspended that Alajhan – Trump allowed to keep slaughter from her post – gave the court more time to consider the administration’s request regarding the judge’s order.

Disputes focus on the authority of the Republican President on the rejection of the heads of the government agency, which is covered by the protection of the removal that Congress has placed to give some agencies a degree of independence from presidential control.

Federal law allows the president to remove the FTC Commissioners only for the reason – such as incompetence, neglecting duty or free from the office – but not for the differences in politics. Similar protection covers officials in other independent agencies, including the National Council for Labor Relations and the Warmwood Systems Protection Council.

The slaughter of one of the Democratic Commissioner who moved Trump was to shoot in March. The shootings have sparked sharp criticism of the Democratic Senate members and anti -collapsed groups that this step was designed to eliminate the opposition within the agency for major companies.

In May, the Supreme Court allowed Trump to divide the National Council for Labor Relations (NLRB) and the MSPB Protection Council – despite the protection of jobs for these jobs – while the litigation continued to challenge that removal.

The court said in this ruling that the American constitution is widely granted the president to shoot government officials who exercise the executive authority on his behalf and the administration “is likely to show that both NLRB and MSPB are practicing the large executive authority.”

Noting this logical basis in July, the court also allowed Trump to remove three democratic members from the most important monitoring of the safety of consumer products in the US government while it represents a legal challenge to remove them.

The administration has repeatedly requested the Supreme Court to allow the implementation of Trump’s policies impossible by the lower courts. The Supreme Court, which has a majority of 6-3 governorate, stood up to administration in almost every case that has been called to review since Trump returned to the presidency in January.

Trump also sought to dismiss the Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook.

Since the removal of the massacre and its colleague, Democratic Commissioner in March, FTC has worked for most of that time with three Republicans, not democratic members.

The agency has followed the conservative policy agenda in recent months, including holding a workshop on what it described as the dangers of gender medical care for sexually transformed youth. FTC Google has warned of liquidating the emails of the Republicans to collect donations because the random mail can be illegal and seeks to investigate the monitoring of the media that billionaire Ilon Musk accuses of helping advertisers from his x.