The United States Supreme Court allows the ban on transgender forces to be satisfied Donald Trump News

The United States Supreme Court allowed a ban Sexual military members To reach the effect with the continued legal challenges on restrictions.

On Tuesday, the majority of the court issued an incident to request Raising a judicial order to the lower court, which prevented the prohibition from valid.

The matter also indicated that the three judges born in the Supreme Court-Sonia Sotomior, Elena Kagan and Kitanji Brown Jackson-sought to reject the emergency request to raise the gossip.

Since he took office for a second on January 20, President Donald Trump has sought to reduce clarity Sexual people In the United States, including through the restrictions imposed on military service.

On his first day in his post, Trump signed an executive thing that his administration “will only recognize the sexes, males and females.” On the same day, he canceled an order from his predecessor, Democrat Joe Biden, who allowed the sexually transformed forces to serve the army.

Then, on January 27, a new unveiled GuidanceAnd he called for “giving priority for military excellence and preparation.” I compared her sexually converted with the adoption of the “false” sex “identity.

This identity was added that the matter was added, it was not compatible with the “strict standards necessary for military service.”

The executive order said: “Adopting a sexual identity that does not agree with the sexual conflicts of the individual with the commitment of the soldier in an honorable, honest and disciplined lifestyle, even in personal life.”

“The man’s assertion that he is a woman, and his condition that others honor this falsehood, does not agree with humility and self -denial required from a member of the service.”

This executive has sparked a large number of legal challenges, including challenges at the Supreme Court Order Center on Tuesday.

In this case, seven members of the active service-in addition to the Civil Rights Organization and another person who hoped to recruit-argued that the ban on their transgender identity was discrimination and unconstitutional.

The group’s defenders indicate that the seven have together got more than 70 medals to serve them. The main prosecutor, Commander Emily Sheling, spent nearly two decades in the navy, raising 60 missions as a combat pilot. Her lawyers estimate that nearly $ 20 million has been invested in training during that time.

But the Trump administration has argued that the presence of the transgender forces is the responsibility for the army.

“Another tremendous victory in the Supreme Court!” White House press secretary Caroline Levitt to publish On social media after Tuesday.

“President Trump and (Defense Minister Beit Higseth) are preparing an army that focuses on preparing and killing.”

Higseth also to publish A short message, using a shortcut to the Ministry of Defense: “No more Trans @ DOD.”

This is not the first time that Trump has tried to exclude the transgender persons from the armed forces. In July 2017, shortly after taking office for his first term, Trump announced a similar policy on the Twitter social media platform, now known as X.

“After consulting with the generals and military experts, please know that the United States government will not accept or allow sexually transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the American army,” Trump wrote in Consecutive PillarsDivided into wheels.

Likewise, in 2019, the Supreme Court allowed this effect. Then, in 2021, the executive order was canceled.

The Trump administration has indicated its previous success in the Supreme Court in its appeal in emergency situations to raise a judicial order to the lower court, which prevents its recent ban on the transgender forces.

This temporary matter was the decision of the American boycott court judge in Takoma, Washington: Benjamin is a settlement. Himself, a former army captain, a settlement was named in his position during the era of former President George W. Bush, a Republican.

In March, the settlement of the embargo imposed on the transgender forces prevented that – although the government referred to “military rule” in its files – its arguments showed “an absence of any evidence” that this restriction relates to military issues.

“The government’s arguments are not convincing, and it is not a particularly close issue in this record,” he wrote.

The other judges also issued a judicial order, including the provincial judge, Anna Reyes, in Washington, DC. In a case in which 14 members of the transgender service were ruled to sue the Trump ban, noting the right to equal protection under the law, stipulated in the fifth amendment to the constitution.

“The harsh paradox is that thousands of sexually transformed soldiers have sacrificed – some of them risk their lives – to ensure equal protection rights for others, as the military embargo seeks to deny them,” Reyes wrote in her decision, which was issued shortly before City in March.

Of more than 2.1 million soldiers served in the US military, less than 1 percent is estimated that he is transgender.

A senior official last year estimates that there are only about 4,200 members of the transgender service in active service, although the defenders say that the number may be a fewer number of number, due to the risk of violence and discrimination associated with being transgender.

Lambda Legal and The Human Rights Foundation were among those who support sexual service members in their battles against Trump’s ban. The two organizations issued a joint statement on Tuesday, condemning the Supreme Court’s decision.

They wrote: “By allowing this discriminatory ban with satisfaction while our challenge continues, the court temporarily approved a policy that has nothing to do with military readiness and everything related to prejudice.”

“We are still steadfast in our belief that this ban violates the constitutional guarantees of equal protection and will eventually be eliminated.”