The United States government has taken stakes in Intel and Nada. The next defense industry can be

In the wake of a controversial decision by the US government to take a royal share in the United States, the Minister of Trade Howard Lootnick suggested in an interview on Tuesday that the Donald Trump administration could look at the Pentagon contractors while throwing more opportunities between the public and private sectors.

“There is a lot of conversation that should be on how to finance acquisitions on our ammunition,” Lottennik told CNBC.

“Lockheed Martin has achieved 97 percent of its revenues from the US government,” he said. “They are mainly the arm of the United States government.”

Lootnick’s comments from Treasury Secretary Scott Beesen, who said on the same network on Monday that “at some point, there will be more transactions.”

Bloomberg’s report on Intel Treatment on Friday said that Trump was embracing a “new brand of economic governance.” But the official in his first administration had more than one cake.

“Washington adopts only the socialism of companies-the profits were privatized, its social losses and taxpayers that have been held hostage to the wealth of companies related to politically,” Fansa Gan, Assistant Director of Economic Policy in the administrative office of the White House and the budget between 2019 and 2020, wrote this week to the American Liberation Institute for Economic Research (AIER).

Background

This summer, the White House announced a number of direct interventions across sectors. In June, it took what Trump called a “golden session” as part of the US steel purchase by Nippon Steel in Japan. Trump criticized Nippon’s offer during the 2024 presidential campaign, but now the United States government The company’s veto decisions can be imagined He sees national security.

Meanwhile, the Ministry of Defense obtained 15 percent of MP materials, and a rare ground mine, and the Trump administration obtained an agreement to allow NVIDIA and AMD to sell small chips to China by obtaining 15 percent of sales revenues.

Then last week, the government said it was getting a 9.9 percent stake in Intel, one of the most Silicon Valley companies, which turned into $ 11.1 billion in the previously released money.

“Intel must be sold to auto parts.”

In particular, the Intel step launched a torrent of the reaction that has deviated from the accurate division between the two parties often in the United States, the government is now a major contributor to a company in the process of reducing its size by more than 20,000 workers.

“I suffer from this idea,” said businessman Kevin Olieri, who was generally supporting the Trump administration policies. On CNBC on Monday. “What made America very wonderful for 200 years is that the government remains in its course.”

“Intel should have been sold to auto parts three years ago,” he added.

Republicans, such as former Vice President Mike Pines and the current Senator in North Carolina, criticized Tom Telese, Intel’s move. Tilis said that it raises a “semi -state -owned institution” as shown in Communist China.

“If socialism is the government to possess production means, the government does not have part of Intel a step towards socialism?” Asked Senator Randor Ball, a Republican with a musician, on social media last week.

Bernie Sanders, a progressive independent of Vermont, who is gathering with Democrats, has spoken in favor of this step.

“If the micro -chips companies make a profit from the generous grants they receive from the federal government, the American taxpayers have a right to a reasonable return on this investment,” as published on social media.

Lootnick says to us

Both the current White House and Joe Biden management sought to reduce dependence on the chips abroad, in a race to lead artificial intelligence.

In the multiple media interviews last week, Lutnick seemed not different from Sanders, with pain to confirm that the government and taxpayers now get something, instead of the Biden administration Intel direct funding under the Law of Chips and Sciences.

“It was just a gift of money,” Lootnick said on Tuesday.

He said that the United States is far from being strange in the world.

He said: “Most of the countries in this world support their most important industries,” noting the recent movements in the United Kingdom to restore the remaining British steel.

Daniel McCarthy, the editor of the American Conservatives, said in an editorial this week that many conservatives cling to outdated ideas about the economy. He said that the government uses the Intel deal as part of a campaign to create a sovereign wealth fund, although it is not without risks, it is ahead of the front.

“The president does not look forward to the past- it comes to the United States competitive with other countries in the twenty-first century, including Communist China, which controls the second and third sovereign wealth funds in the world,” McCarthy books.

“I want to try to get as much as possible

These moves lead to charges of hypocrisy, although Trump does not seem to be interested.

on monday, A reporter indicated He invited the presidential candidate in 2024, Kamala Harris, all kinds of biguors – including “Communism” and “Marxi” – but neither she nor Biden called for the nationalization of a private company.

Trump appears to be agreed that it was a new Republican method “to carry out industrial policy.”

“Certainly,” he said. “I want to try to get the most possible. I hope I have many cases like that.”

The Intel step, which was praised by the administration and the company, came just two weeks after Trump’s call for the resignation of the CEO of the resignation, due to the previous investments in Chinese technology companies while it was a legitimate capitalist. Between them, Trump and Tan met at the White House.

Others refer to the economic cost of this type of industrial policy.

“Every dollar spent by the government spends shares of shares is a dollar that cannot be used to reduce taxes or retirement debts or provide real public goods,” said Gun in Air.

The Editorial Board of National Review, generally favorable to Trump, expanded at that point last week.

The Board of Directors wrote: “A government government worth $ 37 trillion of debt and runs a deficit of $ 2 trillion who has no investment manager in business playing with more borrowing money.”

There is also the possibility of pressure campaigns, as Trump has connected law firms, educational companies and media companies during his second term in his post.

Scott Lincum, from the Free Market Institute, from the Free Market Institute, from the Free Market Institute, from the Free Market Institute, from the Free Market Institute, from the Free Market Institute, from the Free Market Institute, from the Free Market Institute, from the Free Market Institute, from the Free Market Institute, from the Free Market Institute, from the Free Market Institute, from the Free Market Institute, from the Free Market Institute, from the Institute of the Free Market, from the Free Market Institute, from the Free Market Institute, from the Free Market Institute, from the Free Market Institute, from the Free Market Institute, from the Free Market Institute, from the Free Market Institute, from the Free Market Institute, from the Free Market Institute, from the Free Market Institute, from the Institute of Free Market From the Free Market Institute, from the Free Market Institute to targeting now to obtain Intel products, “other American technology companies may now feel pressure to buy Intel products, not because they represent the best technology, but in favor of or avoid targeting by directing direct financial and political interest in the success of Intel.” In the Washington Post.

Talk to ReutersDouglas Xia, an independent consultant in the governance of Soundboard, expressed concern about the definition of a long time to “National Security”.

Finally, Intel He said in the securities file that its international business could be negativeIt was acted by the US government as an important shares holder, as it can be subject to the company to additional regulations or restrictions such as foreign support laws in other countries.

Sales outside the United States account for 76 percent of Intel’s revenues last year, Reuters said, as sales in China represent 29 percent of the total revenue.