The United States deportes men from Asia and Latin America with criminal records to South Sudan after the legal epic

The Trump administration said it had deported a group of eight men convicted of serious crimes in the United States to the conflict -suffering country South SudanAfter a Legal epic That kept the two deportees stuck in a A military base in Djibouti For weeks.

The Assistant Minister of Internal Security, Tricia McLulin, said that the deportation journey that carries the deportees landed in southern Sudan before midnight on Friday. The image presented by the administration, their hands and their feet, showed, sitting inside a plane, guarded by American service members.

Deportation to South Sudan-a country suffering from armed conflict and political instability that the American government warned of his visit-celebrates unprecedented new borders in President Trump’s campaign at the government level on illegal immigration.

There are none of the deportees from South Sudan. They descend from Cuba, Mexico, Laos, Myanmar, Sudan and Vietnam, and they ordered deportation from the United States after being convicted of crimes, including murder, killing, sexual assault and light actions with a child and theft.

The prominent legal battle was crowned about the fate of men when federal judges denied on Friday a recent attempt by immigration rights advocates to stop the deportation, saying that their hands were linked to modern orders from the US Supreme Court.

The deportations indicate a great political victory for the Trump administration, which sought to persuade countries around the world – regardless of their human rights record – to accept deportation who are not citizens, including those convicted of serious crimes.

“The provincial judge cannot dictate national security and foreign policy of the United States of America,” said McLeulin, a spokeswoman for the Ministry of Internal Security. “Independence Day represents another victory for the safety and security of the American people.”

The deportations also disturbed human rights advocates, who are afraid that men will face in prison, torture, or other damage in southern Sudan. They have argued that deportations to South Sudan are determined to punish men for their crimes, although they have already served criminal rulings in the United States

“The US State Department warns the Americans against traveling to southern Sudan, yet they deported these men there without any legal measures,” said Tina Ryano, lawyer for the National Immigration Law, who tried to stop the deportation. “Don’t be mistaken, this deportation was punitive and unconstitutional.”

It is not exactly what the deportees will be dealt with in southern Sudan. The lawyer for the Ministry of Justice told a federal judge on Friday that the South Sudan informed the United States that it would provide men a temporary position of migration, but the lawyer was unable to confirm whether they would be arrested. The Trump administration said in the court files that Sudanese officials in South Sudan have made assurances that the deportees would not face torture.

Men’s deportation is possible by the Supreme Court order earlier this week. At the request of the Trump administration, The Supreme Court on Thursday He explained the scope of the previous order that it issued to stop stopping the deportation of the minimum court prohibits a deportation to the countries of the third party without a degree of due legal procedures and notice.

At that time, the American boycott judge, Brian Murphy, in the state of Massachusetts, asked the Trump administration to give the detainees a sufficient notice and an opportunity to conduct interviews with her by an American asylum officer before any deportation to a country they did not descend from. This issue foiled many deportation efforts, including a plan to send detainees to Libya.

When he learned of the management plan to deport the eight men to South Sudan in May, Murphy prevented this effort, and imposed the United States to maintain the custody of the detainees and provide an opportunity to deport. The administration was transferred to the Camp Lemoner Naval Base in Djibouti, where American officials described the dangerous circumstancesIncluding malaria concerns, missile attacks, insufficient security protocols and three -air outdoor temperatures.

but Supreme Court last month Murphy’s ruling was suspended from April. On Thursday, she said that Murphy was no longer able to ask the government to allow the detainees in Djibouti to contact their deportation, as the matter was stopped.

Hours later, the advocates of immigrant rights from a different federal judge, Randolph Moss in Washington, DC, asked to stop deportations to southern Sudan. He did this on Friday, but just shortly before saying that the request should deal with Murphy.

Moss expressed concern about the dangers of “physical safety” for men and said that the US government should not be in the field of “pain and suffering” to the people who have already spent their punishment, even for a “terrible crime”. But he said that his hands were linked, and they told the defenders that they needed Murphy’s request for any interference.

Later on Friday, Murphy refused to request the defenders, saying that the orders of the Supreme Court were “binding.”