dilemma Whether the United States should join Israel In attacking Iran, or staying out of the attack completely, sections were revealed among US President Donald Trump’s supporters.
The Republican President is considering targeting the nuclear facilities of the Islamic Republic, following a meeting with National Security Advisors in the White House Chamber on Tuesday.
On the campaign’s path, Trump has often rotated “endless stupid wars” in the Middle East, but also confirmed that Iran “could not have a nuclear weapon.”
The possibility of attracting the United States to another foreign tangle has incited the isolation and fallen wings of its party bitterly against each other.
Among those who expressed doubts about Iran’s nuclear plans, Trump’s national intelligence manager, Toulcy Gabbard, who witnessed in March before Congress that while the enriched uranium in Iran was at the highest level ever, experts did not think that she was working on a nuclear weapon.
On June 10 – just three days before the start of Israeli strikes on Iran – Gabbard also released a video in which it warned that “the political and warm elite” was “not interested in fear and tensions” that risk the world “on the edge of nuclear genocide.”
According to what was reported, Gabbard’s video and his previous comments were opened with a rift between them and Trump, who was reported by the American news port “became angry” in the video.
“I don’t care what I said,” Trump told reporters when asked about her previous comments in front of Congress. “I think they were about to get a weapon.”
She later accused the media of taking her previous comments outside the context, and told CNN on the “same page” like Trump.
Gabbard was not alone among Republicans in criticizing the possible US participation in the conflict.
Tuesday, Conservative Republican Congress member Thomas Massi from Kentucky with Democrats stood up to submit a bill that would prevent Trump from involving American forces in “unauthorized hostilities” with Iran without the approval of Congress.
“This is not our war. Even if this is the case, Congress must decide such matters according to our constitution,” Massi was published on X.
Many supporters of Trump’s doctrine “America first” indicated that he pledged to remove the United States from “wars forever”, such as those that led to the death of thousands of American forces in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Former Fox News host Taker Carlson called on the United States to stay out of conflict with Iran.
In his pod, Republican Republicans criticized “warm”, which sparked a reprimand from Trump, which Karlson called “Cookie”.
Congress in Georgia and Trump Margori Taylor Green jumped to Carlson’s defense at a very unusual break with the president.
She said that anyone supported such intervention was not “America first”.
Tensions exploded in the screaming match on Tuesday during an interview between Carlson and Sinnur Texas Ted Cruz. Cruz became defensive when asked whether he knew residents and ethnic mixture of Iran.
“You are a member of the Senate calling for the overthrow of the government and you do not know anything about the country!” Karlson said.
Cruz replied, “No, you don’t know anything about the country!”
Steve Bannon, former Trump’s strategic expert in Podcast Carlson, has argued that allowing “the deep state” to push the United States into a war with Iran that would “explode” the Trump supporter alliance.
He said: “If we are absorbed in this war, which seems unabated that it will happen on the combat side, it will not only explode the alliance, but will also frustrate the most important thing, which is the deportation of foreign invaders who are here.”
However, on Wednesday, Bannon seemed a little bit of his tone, and he told those present at a Christian Christian event that the Maga wing of his supporters trust his rule if he decides that the American forces commit to the conflict.
“Perhaps we hate it but you know, we will get on the plane.” He said.
Another conservative political commentator, Charlie Kirk – who describes himself as closer to the “isolation” side of the discussion – said that X that Trump is “practical” and the values of “sound instinct”.
“I don’t know if President Trump will choose to involve America against Iran,” Kirk wrote. “But he is a man I trust in making this decision.”
“It was a kind of bad week of isolation” in the party.
“What is happening here is some isolation movement led by Taker Karlson and Steve Bannon, as we help the Israelis defeat the Iranians,” McConnell told CNN.
Other Warhawks in the party wandering in Trump to target Iran.
Sinator South Carolina Lindsey Graham said that in the United States’ national security services to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear bomb. Tehran maintains its nuclear program for peaceful civil purposes such as energy.
President Trump understands the threat of Ayatollah (Iran’s supreme leader Ali KhounaiGraham told Fox News: “Israel offers us Fox News:
“Trump may decide that he needs to conduct more measures to end the Iranian enrichment.”
“This decision ultimately belongs to the president,” he added. “Of course, people are right to worry about foreign tangle after the past 25 years of stupid foreign policy.”
In recent days, the poll indicates that Trump’s voters will widely support the United States in helping Israel attack Iran.
Gray House’s poll found that 79 % of the respondents will support the United States, which provides the attack Weapons for Israel to strike the Iranian Military targets. About 89 % was concerned about getting offspring bombs.
However, many of the Trump social media platform, many expressed concern that the United States could find itself involved in a Middle East conflict thousands of miles away.
“There is no war with Iran. No more foreign wars,” a user wrote. “America first!”
Another user has warned that the participation of the United States in Israeli operations may cost Republicans politically in the coming years.
“Don’t do this,” the user’s books. “Republicans will not win again if you do it.”
While he campaign for the White House in September, Trump said: “We will quickly restore stability in the Middle East. We will return the world to peace.”
With Iran’s struggle for Israel on the edge of the knife, the issue of whether the American president is isolation or an urgent intervention may be answered and not later.
https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/1024/branded_news/d705/live/3d3b1390-4c28-11f0-a466-d54f65b60deb.jpg
Source link