The Trump administration takes definitions with the US Supreme Court

The Trump administration took the battle over its tariff to the US Supreme Court on Wednesday, and they asked the judges to quickly judge that the president has the authority to impose sweeping trade sanctions under federal law.

The US government called on the court to reverse the court of the Court of Appeal that most US President Donald Trump’s tariff is an illegal use of the emergency authorities law.

The American Court of Appeal of the Federal Department left the definitions at the present time, but the administration called on the Supreme Court to quickly intervene in the seam submitted on Wednesday and submitted to the Associated Press.

It was expected to be officially included on Thursday.

The American Attorney General, d. John Sawir is the judges to take the case and hear the arguments in early November.

“This decision takes a view of uncertainty about continuous foreign negotiations stating that the president is following through definitions during the past five months, which exposes both the framework deals that have already been negotiated and continuous negotiations,” he wrote.

“The risks in this case cannot be higher.”

Definitions that hurt me small companies: lawyer

Jeffrey Schwab, chief adviser and director of litigation at the Freedom Center, said that the risks are large for small companies that were beaten by definitions and uncertainty.

“These illegal definitions cause serious harm to small companies and endangering them. We hope a quick solution to this issue for our customers,” he said.

The companies prevailed twice, once in a federal court that focused on trade and again with the court of the Court of Appeal 7-4

The customs tariff and its irregular offering rocked the global markets, led to the isolation of American commercial partners and its allies, and raised fears of high prices and slow economic growth.

But Trump also used fees to pressure the European Union, Japan and other countries to accept new trade deals. The total customs tariff revenues amounted to $ 159 billion in late August, more than twice that it was at the same point in the previous year.

Most of the judges in the US Appeals Court of the Federal Department found that the 1977 Economic Forces Law did not allow Trump to rape the Congress in definitions. The dissidents said that it allowed the president to organize import without explicit restrictions during emergency situations.

The ruling includes two groups of import taxes, both of which justify Trump by announcing a national emergency: the customs tariff was announced for the first time in April and that February on imports from Canada, China and Mexico.

The United States Constitution gives Congress the authority to impose taxes, including definitions. But over the decades, the legislators abandoned the president, and Trump has benefited from the power vacuum.

Some tariff tariffs, including foreign steel, aluminum and cars, were not covered by the Court of Appeal. It also does not include the customs tariff that Trump imposed on China during his first term that US President Joe Biden kept.

Trump can impose customs duties under other laws, but they have more restrictions on the speed and intensity that he can act with.

The government argued that if customs duties are exposed, it may have to recover some of the collected import taxes, which provides a financial blow to the United States Treasury.