The Trump administration seeks to deport Kilmar Abrego Garcia to Uganda Immigration news

The case of Abu Garcia is still a flash point in the campaign of US President Donald Trump.

US immigration officials say they intend to deport Kilmar Abrago Garcia For Uganda, according to the court’s report, what the legal team describes as “worked” by the administration of US President Donald Trump.

The court file said on Saturday the idea of ​​sending Abyerigo Garcia To Uganda He came after he rejected an offer to deport to Costa Rica for staying in prison and confessed to guilt on the charges of human smuggling.

He acknowledged that he was not guilty and asked the judge to reject the case, claiming that it was an attempt to punish him for challenging his deportation from the United States to El Salvador earlier this year.

The ABREGO GARCIA case has become a flash point on Trump’s militant agenda, anti -immigration after the Silvadori patriotism was mistakenly deported in March.

Confronting an order from the court, the Trump administration re To the United States in June, only for his detention on human smuggling charges.

Costa Rica’s offer came late on Thursday, after it was clear that Abyerigo Garcia is likely to be released from Tennessee prison the next day.

Abjjo Garcia refused to extend his residency in prison and was It was released on Friday To wait for the trial in Maryland with his family.

Later that day, the US Department of Internal Security informed his lawyer that he would be deported to Uganda and must submit a report to the immigration authorities on Monday.

“The government immediately responded to the release of Mr. Abrago regardless,” and he reads the deposit of the Intro Garcia lawyers.

“Despite the request and receipt of assurances from the Costa Rica government that Mr. Abrago will be accepted there, within minutes of his release from the nursery before the trial, the ice representative, the lawyer of Mr. Abjo, told the government that the government intends to deport Mr. Abrago to Uganda and ordered him to report the field office in Baltimore in the Paltimore.”

The deposit also accuses US officials of “using their collective powers to force Mr. Abrego to choose between acknowledgment of guilt, followed by relative safety, or handing over to Uganda, where his safety and freedom of defeat will be.”

“It is difficult to imagine a path that the government could take would better emphasize its stability,” she says.

Although Alago Garcia was eligible to release before the trial, he remained in prison at the request of his lawyer, who were afraid that the Trump administration would try to try to deport him immediately if he was released.

These concerns have been somewhat calm by a recent ruling in a separate case in Maryland, which requires immigration officials to allow Parisia Garcia in defense time.

Questions about legal procedures

Abrego Garcia has lived in the United States under the legal status protected since 2019, when the judge died that he should not be deported because he might be harmed in his homeland.

Then he became one of more than 200 people they sent to him Salvador Sicot huge As part of the Trump campaign against immigrants and asylum seekers in the United States.

But the lawyer of the Ministry of Justice admitted that the Al -Salvaduri citizen had been deported because of a “administrative error.”

Abyerigo Garcia – who denies any violations – is now accused of participating in the smuggling of immigrants who are not documented from Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras and other countries in the United States between 2016 and earlier this year.

His trial is scheduled to start in the case of human smuggling in January 2027.

“Regardless of your opinion on Mr. Abjo Garcia, if you believe in Legal proceduresYou should be angry “through the effort made to send it to Uganda.

“The Trump official threatens to throw him in Africa as a punishment for not being convicted of the criminal charges they brought to avoid compliance with the court’s order,” he wrote Reichlin-Melnick on X.

The Trump administration defended its policies, saying that the American president had been elected a promise To implement the “largest deportation” in the country’s history.

But Washington’s batch of people’s deportation has extracted widespread criticism, with removal to the third countries, in particular, which feeds fears that those who are sent abroad may face human rights violations and other dangers.

Last month, the Trump administration sent Eight men to South SudanA country controlled by political instability and violence.