The Trump administration requests us from the Supreme Court to support a matter that aims to end the vertical citizenship

The administration of US President Donald Trump requests the Supreme Court to support the citizenship order in the field of birth, which announces that children born to parents in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens.

On Saturday, the appeal, shared with Associated Press, calls for an operation in the Supreme Court in Washington, DC, which may lead to a final ruling from the judges by early summer on whether the restrictions of citizenship are constitutional.

Low judges have been prevented by the court so far from being in effect anywhere. The republican administration does not ask the court to allow the valid restrictions before its rules.

The Ministry of Justice’s petition has been shared with lawyers that challenge the matter, but it has not yet been equipped in the Supreme Court.

Perhaps any decision on whether the case should be followed months away and the arguments may not occur until late winter or early spring.

“The minimum decisions of the court have nullified the president of the president of the president and his administration in a way that undermines our border security,” the public lawyer, De John Sawir, wrote in the petition. “These decisions give, without legal justification, the American citizenship concession over hundreds of thousands of unqualified persons.”

“This executive is illegal,” the lawyer says.

Cody Wafsi, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union, represents children who will be affected by Trump’s restrictions.

Wafsi said that the administration’s plan is clearly unconstitutional.

“This executive matter is illegal, a complete stop, and there is no degree of maneuvering that will change this. We will continue to ensure that the citizenship of any child is not stripped of this harsh and unreasonable matter,” Wafsi said in an email.

Trump signed the executive order in January on the first day of his second term at the White House. Critics said that the matter will work more than 125 years of understanding that the fourteenth amendment to the constitution gives nationality to every person born on American soil, with narrow exceptions to the children of foreign diplomats and those who are born to a foreign occupation force.

In a series of decisions, the lower courts canceled the executive order as unconstitutional, or most likely, even after the Supreme Court ruling in late June, which restricted the use of judges to restraining orders at the country level.

While the Supreme Court has justified the use of restraining orders at the country, it has not excluded the orders of other courts that could have traces at the country level, including collective lawsuits and those submitted by states. Judges at that time did not decide whether the basic citizenship order was constitutional.

But every minimum court looked at this case concluded that Trump’s order was or probably violated the fourteenth amendment, which was aimed at ensuring that blacks, including former slaves, had citizenship.

California, New Hampshire issues under appeal

The administration resumes two cases.

In July, the US Court of Appeal in San Francisco ruled that a group of countries that filed a lawsuit at the country needs a judicial order at the country level to prevent the problems that citizenship will occur in the field of birth in some states, not the other. In July, a federal judge in New Hampshire prevented citizenship order in a collective lawsuit, including all children who will be affected.

The automatically born citizenship makes anyone born in the United States a American citizen, including children who illegally work in the country. But the administration confirms that children of non -citizen are not subject to the judicial state, “and therefore they are not entitled to obtain citizenship.