The trial of “serious injury” alternatives is scheduled to start in the first -class crochet game

In a modern development, the International Council of Cricket (ICC) presented a new base for replacing “similar” players in the first -class cricket. According to the rules, players with a “serious injury” will be allowed during a game at any time, including during the warm -up period.

The issue of serious injuries gained attention during the last Zimbabwe test against England when the rapid football player Richard Najjarva was injured in the opening day in Trent Bridge. He returned to the field at a later time, but he was not allowed to contain a lot of time on the field.

NGARAVA was in case of visual discomfort and the field eventually left again. This situation sparked calls for more flexible alternative rules in the cricket. It is worth noting that the International Criminal Court decided to try alternatives to injuries “such as” in local first -class matches.

ICC to start a six -month trial

The International Criminal Court has been appointed for full replacement, such as “such as” such as first -class cricket, according to the BBC report. At the present time, alternatives are only allowed for concussions, while other alternatives to other injuries are limited to field duties or wigs and bats or bowl cannot be possible.

The entire states of members can experience a similar alternative such as at any time, provided that the injury is serious. The base will not apply to simple issues such as muscle penis or withdrawal of knee strings. The alternative must have a set of skills similar to the injured player group.

“The alternative may not be a plate or act as a leader, but it is permissible for him to work as a goalkeeper only with the approval of the referees,” says the relevant law.

Dangerous injuries can strongly affect the difference with no complete alternatives

The serious injury can leave a team in a non -favorable position, especially if you lose the main pyramid or mixture. With the rider not allowing, the striking aspects are also affected when the players are harmed.

Earlier this year, Gasbert Boumerte suffered a back injury during the final test of the Gavascar Cup in Sydney. Pomara, who was exceptional throughout the series, was forced to leave the field, and his absence helped Australia to seize the feature and win the series, the first in a decade.

No alternative could have really matching Pumra caliber, but an alternative similar to what was similar, which would have at least India with another bowling option in a high -risk match.

Approval of the base of replacing the injury may require strict control of the rulers

The International Criminal Court will start a six -month experience in October, allowing the full states of members using similar alternatives to serious injuries in local first -class matches. The test regulations currently do not allow complete alternatives, except in concussion.

If the rule is approved after the experiment, the rulers will need to remain at a state of great alert to prevent potential misuse. In the past, the teams have used regularly regular alternatives, and the new fields of the parking players alternate the archers.

There were also concerns about the exploitation of the concussion protocol, as it is claimed that the teams that offer players are more suitable for conditions instead of really comparable alternatives. The experiment will help evaluate whether these alternatives can be implemented fairly and effectively.

Also read: Jasbert Pomara’s test called for a strong one before the second match against England