“The sympathy remains; “How is this hard?”: Internet users are divided on SC’s decision on stray dogs

The Supreme Court is directed to remove all stray dogs from the Delhi-denial areas and place them in the shelters that have a community-in the streets as well as online-to participate in an enthusiastic discussion about animal rights. While many believe this is the right step to keep the streets free of stray fangs, many have also argued over the rights of these voices.

Animal, nutrient lovers, rescue men and caregivers from all over Delhi NCR at the India Gate to protest the decision. The demonstrators said that this is not the solution to the problem, but they called for strict rules for the offspring of the animal (ABC) instead. ABC rules stipulate sterilization, vaccination and release of community dogs to their areas.

Moreover, rabies caused by dog bites have become one of the controversial debate points between the two sides. The demonstrators said that there were only 54 deaths in rabies in 2024, according to government data.

Animal rights activist and former Minister of Union, Manica Gandhi, said the Supreme Court’s plan is not a process. “You have three Kah dogs in Delhi. To keep them all of them, you will have to make 3000 pounds, each of which are drainage, shed, kitchen, and guard. This will cost about 15,000 rupees. Do Delhi have 15,000 rupees for this?” She said.

“Within 48 hours, 3 dogs will come from gasbad, Faridabad because there is food in Delhi. Once the dogs are removed, the monkeys will come on the ground … I have seen it happening in my home.

Internet users are divided

Internet users, such as society, are divided into decision. While many witness the decision, many describe it as a harsh step that will eventually lead to many dogs to their death.

What the Supreme Court said

The Supreme Court issued a directive to remove all stray dogs from the areas in the Delhi NCR area, saying that the fangs should be placed in shelters and not returning to the streets. The court described the incidents of stray dog bites as “very dark”.

A group of JB Pardiwala and R Mahdevan warned that any individual or organization that hinders the removal will face strict procedures. “If any individual or any organization comes in the way of this force, picking up stray dogs and wandering them, and if they are reported, we will continue to take strict measures against any resistance that might be submitted,” I noticed the seat.

It arises from the Suo Motu case regarding dogs leading to rabies. Judge Bardiola asked about the ability of animal activists to address the consequences of such incidents, asking: “Will they return life to these children?”

The court stipulated that the authorities “initially pick up stray dogs from all areas, especially the weak sites of the city, as well as the areas on the suburbs.”

The court imposed that all the captive dogs must remain in the shelters, saying: “However, the important thing, without this, the entire exercise may be useless, is that it is not permissible to release one dog captured from any part of the area in the streets/public places.”

The availability of rabies vaccines has also been addressed, as the seat indicated that “the availability of rabies vaccines is a great concern, especially the real vaccines. The relevant authorities, especially the NCT government in Delhi, are directed to develop detailed information about the places where these vaccines are available.”