The strange documentary in the new world seeks the biggest problem with Modern Star Trek

This article contains Spoilers For the latest episode of “Star Trek: Strange New Worlds.”

In the latest episode of “Star Trek: Strange New Worlds” (entitled “What is Starfleet?”), A young civilian named Beto Ortegas (Mynor Lüken), brother of Hotshot Erica Ortegas (Melissa Navia), decided to make a documentary on the international union and the extent of resurrection Shipe Musions. Beto has a agenda, however. He does not want to just the Starflete. He wants to confront him. He believes that Starfleet is more an aggressive military organization more devoted to conflict and violence more than peace and diplomacy, despite its allegations.

Beto’s doubts prove that it is correct in disappointing when it comes to the current task of the institution. Al -Ittihad has completely confusing, along with a war between two universal worlds, and agreed to help the aggressors, in their efforts to overthrow their characteristics. As a result, the Foundation was sent to a foreign space recovery, which was specially raised to serve as a devastating weapon. Captain Pike (Anason Mount) believes that the foreigner will be a weapon and continue with the mission anyway. There are several times when Pike talks about how he and his crew need to follow orders, saying that the true nature of their mission is classified. Only through an independent investigation and the restoration of micro ethical wires, Bike and his officers begin to question the ethics of the fiscal slave to submit to a deadly war aggressor.

It is worth noting that he did not reveal how Starfleet was deeply shared in the war voltage to start. The “Star Trek” privilege was a permanent famous ownership of peace, not violence. The war is the final moral failure in the world of “Star Trek”, and Starfleet is usually involved in an armed conflict when all other options were literally exhausted.

But there may be something bigger to play here. Perhaps the book behind “What is Starfleet?” They are trying to make a comment on the way “Star Trek” has become very violent since it started a new life on Paramount+.

From 2005 to 2017, there was no new “Star Trek” on TV. “Star Trek: Enterprise” has been canceled, and the privilege was restarted on the large screen by JJ Abrams. Rerading the last characters from “Star Trek: The Original Series” as smaller, more sexual and alternative publications for themselves, most notably, he intensified work and violence. When doing this, about “Star Trek” from Nardi’s privilege about diplomats and explorers to a high -end shooting. The fans ate that, and the 2009 ABRAMS movie “Star Trek” became a great financial success.

It was one of the film’s book, Alex Kurtzman, behind the scenario of the Michael Bay films full of movement such as “The Island” and “Transformers”, so the color shift was great. Kurtzman specializes in writing slow motion sequences, while the “Star Trek” privilege was, before that, often very and thoughtful. Regardless, follow Kurtzman participated in writing the “Star Trek in Darkness” in 2013 before it was placed in all “Star Trek” things when the property returned to TV in 2017 on the CBS All Service service (which has been renovated since then Paramount+). In the same year, he co -created “Star Trek: Discovery”, followed by “Star Trek: Picard” and several other offers.

This new series was not only different from the classic “Star Trek” shows, but it also felt the difference. Adopt a more aggressive tone, as the first season of “discovery” deals directly with the war between the Union and the Klingons. There were also more scenes of manual fighting, photography, and mouth battles, with “discovery” and “Picard” heroes who kill others regularly. Fans sites They collected the number of people who were killed by “Discovery” Michael Burnham (Sonequa Martin-Green), where the number of killing was sitting in 58 huge episodes in only 65 episodes.

Violence was a new ethics for the “Star Trek” privilegeAnd trekkies old schools gay rough. There was a lot of death for property who had previously been devoted to peace.

This is “What is Starfleet?” It comes. It seems that the episode’s book, Catherine Lin and Alan B. McLeroi, they were interested in interrogating the “Star Trek” television after 2017. Perhaps the title of the episode was “What” Star Trek? Starfleet (Re: Star Trek) is depicted as a mandate of violence. I feel that Kurstmann has more science fiction stories, and it is doubts that play over and over again in “discovery” and Her transverse movie “Star Trek: Section 31.” He may have encouraged his book to include more weapons battles, one betrayal, and traditional pharaoh.

“What is Starfleet?” He temporarily stops asking each of the characters on “strange new worlds” and viewers who are watching what we are doing here. Is Starfleet Development (and thus the “Star Trek” privilege) for war efforts now? Is it really our mission to provide a super automatic tuna to a war zone? Or should we stop and sweep what we are doing here? Is our task one of the victory of War time, or is it more sensitive than that?

“What is Starfleet?” It ends with the various characters who are praising the artistic organization as the best example of the strength of the personality. Starfleet is not related to its tasks, as it could be – regardless of the quality of its intentions – based on misleading principles, and it is not related to the military authority. Instead, it is a group of moral forces for everyone inside. Thus, the “Star Trek” privilege revolves around the ethics of its characters. “Star Trek” is not a violent property, and this episode appears to be presented, but it is peaceful. Display designs needed to stop and reconsider their actions such as imaginary members of the foundation crew. It is already a strong account.

The new episodes of “Star Trek: Strange New Worlds” start on Thursday on Paramount+.