The rules of the US Supreme Court can reduce Trump nearly $ 800 million of health financing Donald Trump News

Scotus’s decision affects Dei programs that include breast cancer research and the prevention of HIV.

The highest court in the United States ruled that the Trump administration It can be cut off Hundreds of millions of dollars of research financing for breast cancer and the prevention of HIV and suicide virus, among other issues, in pushing it to reduce efforts of federal diversity, stocks and integration (Dei).

In Resolution 5-4 on Thursday, the Supreme Court raised the order of the judge to ban discounts worth $ 783 million from the National Health Institutes (NIH) to comply with the priorities of Republican President Donald Trump.

Judges granted the Ministry of Justice A request to raise its headquarters in Boston The decision of the American boycott judge, William Young, in June is that the end of the grants violated federal law, while the legal challenge brought by the researchers and 16 American states plays in a lower court.

The matter represents the last victory in Trump’s Supreme Court and allows the administration to move forward to cancel hundreds of grants while the lawsuit continues to disclose. Prosecutors, including states and public health advocacy groups, have argued that discounts will cause “countless loss of public health and human life.”

The National Health Institutes are the largest financier in the world for biomedical research. These cuts are part of Trump’s large -scale actions to reshape the US government, reduce federal spending and end government support for programs that aim to enhance diversity or “sexual ideology” opposed by the administration.

The administration said that Young’s ruling asked the National Health Institutes to continue to pay $ 783 million as grants that contradict its priorities.

The Supreme Court, which has a majority of 6-3 governorate, stood up to administration in almost every case that has been called to review since Trump returned to the presidency in January.

After Trump signed executive orders in January targeting the ideology and ideology between the sexes, the National Health Institutes of Health ordered the end of grant financing for “low and external value” studies that are related to these concepts, as well as Covid-19 and ways to curb vaccines.

Young’s ruling came in lawsuits that defy the cuts. One of them was presented by the American Public Health Association, individual researchers and other prosecutors, who were called “continuous ideological cleansing” that target projects on the basis of “mysterious language, now embracing”. The other was presented by the states, most of which are the leadership of democracy.

The prosecutors said that the ended grants included projects on breast cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, and the prevention of HIV, suicide, depression and other cases that are often the responsibility of non -proportional minority societies, as well as grants imposed by Congress on training and supporting a variety of scientists in biological research.

Young, appointed to former Republican President Ronald Reagan, invalidated grants in June. In a written ruling, the judge said that they are “arbitrary and amazingly volatile”, violating a federal law that governs the actions of agencies.

During a June hearing in the case, Young reprimanded the administration for what he called “darker aspect” to the issue that represents the discounts “racial discrimination and discrimination against the LGBTQ community in America.”

The judge said: “I have never seen a record where racial discrimination was very clear,” the judge said.

Young also said that the cuts were designed to stop research bearing the health of the LGBTQ community. The judge said: “This is terrible.”

The administration argued that litigation should have been submitted in a various judicial body, which is the Federal Claims Court, which is based in Washington, which specializes in damaging money against the US government.

This logic was also the basis of the Supreme Court’s decision in April, which allowed the Trump administration to apply for it Millions of dollars From discounts to granting teachers training, which is also targeted under the Dei campaign.