The rules of the judge can use some of the copyrights protected to feed their sludge

This week, a federal judge handed over artificial intelligence companies a major victory, which is likely to determine a legal precedent for this industry to loot it protected by copyrights to train its large language models.

Antarbur, the Amazon Big Intelligence Intelligence Company, was in a legal battle with a group of writers and journalists Who filed a lawsuit against the company last summer They accused them of using their business illegally to train the pioneering Chatbot of the company, Claude. The legitimacy of the entire business model in the artificial intelligence industry The question has long been dependent on the question About whether it is important to reach large amounts of copyright data from all over the web and then feed it in an algorithm to produce “original” text. Anthrops emphasized that its use of the book’s work falls Adel use Thus it is legal. This week, the federal judge agreed to the case, William Alsup, partly.

in wisdomAlsup claimed that by training LLM without the authors’ permission, Antarubor did not violate the copyright -protected materials because the work it produced was, in his eyes, original. He claimed that the company’s algorithms have …

“… it has not been cloned to the creative elements of a specific work, not even a one -expressed style of the author …

The ALSUP ruling is a little bit of litigation of the book, which accused the anthropologist of human expression “talisman” and creativity for corporate profits. This ruling is just the opinion of one of the judges, but critics are afraid that it will be easy to set a precedent for other legal decisions throughout the country. Artificial intelligence companies have been prosecuted dozens of times by creators for similar reasons.

Although Alsup’s decision may indicate wider victories for the artificial intelligence industry, it is not exactly what you call victory in the anthropor. This is because AlsUP also ruled that the specific method that the anthropologist has cast some of its copyrights – by downloading more than 7 million pirated books – can be illegal, and will require a separate experience. “We will have an experience on pirated copies used to create the Central Library of Anthropor and the resulting damage,” Alsup wrote. “This Antarbur later bought a copy of the book () stolen earlier in the Internet that will not be relieved of responsibility for theft, but it may affect the extent of legal damage.”

When it was reached for the comment by Gizmodo, the Antarbur presented the following statement: “We are happy that the court realized that the use of“ working to train LLMS was transformative – amazingly. ” Solid and create something different. “

Alsup presides over many prominent cases that include large technology companies, including Uber, DooDash and Waymo. Recently, ALSUP ordered the Trump administration To return thousands of absolute test workers Those who were expelled by the Duj Elon Musk initiative.