The researchers say that anger of the plum barrel was driven by robots

Have you felt something … about the catastrophe of the whole broken barrel? Is, in the midst of the endless anger directed at the southern restaurant in the rural style, a pause and thinking, “There is no way that anyone cares about the logo of the barrel of this barrel a lot, right?” Well, you may be on something. According to the data collected by the PEAKMETRICS intelligence platform, it seems that nearly half of the early posts about changing the Cracker Barre logo created by robot programs.

Peakmetrics grabbed a sample of 52000 jobs that were performed on X within the first 24 hours of the Cracker barrel that it will update its logo to a very normal and public design. In this timeline, it was found that 44.5 % of all references of the cracking barrels were marked by the possibility or the highest robot activity. These numbers climb up when the boycott is mentioned. About 1000 jobs in that first period of 24 hours called on people to stop eating in the Cracker barrel, and 49 % of these publications have been marked by a possible robot. In its report, Peakmetrics states that the boycott is unlikely to be a response at the level of the organic base, but “amplifying the help of robots classified by Meme/activist accounts.”

Campaign does not look as if they were limited to X, too. According to the data collected by open measuresSimilar conversations were on advanced technology platforms such as Donald Trust Social, Twitter Gettr, GAB, 4chant and Rumble. On these platforms, the stickers regularly linked to changing the slogan of the cracking barrel to conditions such as “waking up” and “Dei”, because it seems, one of the demands of leftist extremists corresponds to Sans-Serif sovereignty.

From August 19, when the logo was changed to September 5, a few days after the company The logo retreated But too Delete LGBTQ and diversity and inclusion pages From its website, about 2020,000 publications were made about a full disaster on X. Peakmetrics that nearly a quarter, 24 % in total, is likely to be published by robots. Ironically, given the angry group by everything that loves to contact the people who disagree with them Npcs.

Of course, this means that 75 % of these jobs were from people. Peakmetrics notes that the first publications that express panic and frustration in the Cracker Barrel decision to update their slogan came from human accounts. Once the robot networks begin to capture this trend, they blew up the whole matter. The report said, “The authentic voices made it clear cultural dissatisfaction, which the robots swelled and then exaggerated,” the report said.

Peakmetrics Megaphone Bot has not attributed to any specific organization or representative. Instead, I found, “The initiators are ideological active accounts with the date of published in the previous cultural war, with the support of robots.” One of them may read that angry right farmers seem to have some unreliable support that makes them look more influential than they are already.

Perhaps knowing that these anger courses are not completely authentic to be enough for companies like Cracker Barrel simply ignoring the anger cycle, knowing that most officers will not rise to anything. Robots do not eat biscuits and broth, after all.