The real reason for director Ivan Restman did not make Ghostbusters 3

after Limited box office for “Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire”, “ There is an argument that may now be time to give up the ghost (corps) forever. Five films in, and the numbers indicate that the privilege is not what it was. But then, if Ivan Reteman was on his way, he would not have allowed him to reach this extent. During the appearance of Neil Brennan Podcast “blocs”The son of Retman and the director of “ghostbusters: feedlife”, Jason Reteman, revealed the reason for his father’s return to the fire house after “Ghostbusters II” to give the world “Ghostbusters III”. In an industry that has flourished on giving us more the same, Ivan Retman was the happiest thing, and perhaps preferred to close the trap forever after “Ghostbusters” in 1984.

“My father did not understand the sequences. My father was like,” I don’t know why people want to return to these things, “Jason Reteman explained. When it comes to his own supplement in the concession, the young director got a mixed reception from his father. He says:

“When I wrote” the hereafter “, she met with this girl, and she, like, goes out to Oklahoma, finds a proton package, and my father like,” this is wonderful. “Then terrorist dogs appeared, which is the same as” 84, which is like Gozer? It is like, “Can I have a new story?”

This enthusiasm explains the most common formulation of Hollywood, his lack of interest in one of the most creative options in the privilege.

Although it is still a common introduction to many, there is no doubt about this “Ghostbusters” films“Ghostbusters II” not only hit the place among fans like its predecessor. The appearance of Lady Liberty and Vigo Carpitat (Wilhelm von Humburg) aside, the most care is not placed on a second picnic with the team as before, including the weak interest in the care granted to their ride, ECTO-1. “This is the extent of my father’s interest in sequences: on the Gostbusters in” Ghostbusters II “, it has the slogan” ghostbusters II “). This is meaning He has great concern about him.

It will be some time before the microcosm of the family will get an answer (if you can call it). “I asked him years later, I was like,” Why does the “Ghostbusters” movie logo appear to the ECTO-1? Do they realize that they are in a continuation? Is this why they have Ghostbusters Ghost with two on the side of their material car? My father was like, “Yes, this may have been a mistake.” Like, it was not (sponsorship).

Over time, the fans’ love for follow -up has not changed. While Jason Ritman admits that he is the scene of the film industry now, it is not what his father was. “I think it is one of the reasons why the” ghostbusters “did not flourish, such as, for decades, is the reason why” ghostbusters “was like” I will go to “twins.” He made “ghostbusters II” and then there is nothing for years. “It will not be until 2016 that the absence of the Ghostbusting team ends, just to be confronted with a somewhat negative reception. Ghostbusters was bombed: Answer the call,” while earning some fans, with negative reactions from a group of unsafe gates thanks to the decision Dill (GASP) are female representatives of a completely new team, though Dan Icroid is still standing next to the decision.

Then in 2021, we used to return to the well -full mud with Jason Reteman, who ties the points that he did not touch for more than three decades. By this point, the director was already aware of what it was by launching the proton packages again. “This thing that people love about Marvel, where every part of this privilege, whether it is the lunch box or a comic book, knocks on a collective story. This is the opposite of my father. By placing things to rest, and perhaps this was what should have been done from the beginning.