The reaction of the hot bench judges to the Battle of Justin Balouni and Blake Levli legal

the Hot seat Judges believe that it is too early to reach a ruling Justin Balouni and Blake LivlyContinuous legal battle.

“I think there is a lot that will come in this movie so that you can change your opinion every two minutes,” the judge Rachel Khwariz Exclusively shared with For us and we can Before the celebration Hot seat‘s Episode 2000 on Thursday, January 23. “Every time someone says something, you can change your opinion. I block the ruling. I have some strong opinions that are starting to form. But I think we do not know yet. ”

Khuraiz and her comrades Hot seat Judges Michael Correro and Yudet Toyold It has nothing to do with the case.

In December 2024, New York Times Break Levli was succumbing to the debt of sexual harassment and claiming to launch a “social manipulation” campaign against it “to destroy” its reputation. (Balmone Deny Through his lawyer Brian Friedman.)

Balunin later Lay a lawsuit against New York Times On charges of defamation and false infringement of privacy. (A. New York Times The spokesperson supported the story, saying it was “published accurately and responsibly.”

the Virgin Jin The star also filed a lawsuit against Lively 400 million dollars In damage and She accused the actress Being “determined to make the true evil in her story.” (Live also has I denied everything he has Allegations.)

“When you file a lawsuit like this and choose a number, you actually start with a number of nothing,” said Khuraiz. we When responding to No. 400 million dollars. “No one actually caused the specified damage.”

Friedman described as a “smart man” and a “strategic lawyer”, perhaps “he wanted to obtain the value of 400 million dollars.”

“It seems to me that this, even if he recovered, is unlikely to recover,” he added. “But I think they were sending a message saying:” This is how bad I did. “It is a $ 400 million problem.”

Judge Thiwold is jokingly said that she was waiting for “seeing more receipts” before choosing one of the two sides in the legal battle, which had great media coverage.

She referred to a New video from It ends with us The scene, which a team believes, proves its side of the story.

She participated: “The Justin team released these unpopular footage of this clip and after I watched the movie from time to time and collected them together and compared them to the words in her complaint, I do not really see things, but I will wait and see how this will end.”

What all judges can agree on is that this case will be “wonderful” worth seeing.

“I watched the movie, and I thought it was a great movie that carries a good message and I thought it was very well produced, but I think what this will do all of this is the actual, not liberated versions of the viewer who represents a problem.”, Judge Coriero expected. “I think this will be very important for the judge and the jury.”

“It is an advanced process. This will be great,” Khwariz added.

the Hot seat Judges have been dealing with their unique cases on the small screen for several years. On January 23, the trio celebrated 2000 episodes of their presentation in the courtroom, which includes the first committee of three judges ever.

While the litigants are much less famous, Khwariz, Koreiro and Toyold are determined to issue the right judgment in every case.

“You have to hear why we have reached a result and whether we can reach consensus together or what is our logical justification,” Coriero jokingly said. “I think this makes it more interesting because it gives us an opportunity to educate and test our views with each other and entertain.”

Hot seat It is broadcast on the days of the week. Check your Local lists.