While the US military has been lavishly in the missile defense over the past few decades, it “appears for little”, it is recently argued. a report It was published by the Public Affairs Committee of the American Physical Association, a non -profit institution that examines physics and other scientific issues.
The authors, who indicated that the United States’ financing for missile defense usually increases in response to things such as the “presidential call”, that the current system in America cannot reliably descend missiles and warheads, not to mention the attacks of more advanced actors.
Montgomery Wire told that the United States should be particularly concerned about the advanced long -range ballistic missiles from China, Russia and Iran.
Go to space
Laura Grejo, great research director of the Union of the relevant scientists and a co -author of the report, says she is getting the reason for the Trump administration’s desire to fired missile objections from space.
The exhibitions launched from the land sites may have to travel hundreds of miles horizontally, while the intersection in space needs to travel only for a short distance to reach a missile and stop it in its paths. “Most people intuition is that the space is far,” says Grejo. “But in this case, the space is close. The space is near as much as you can get it.”
Grejo adds that the idea of building an anti -anti -fabric system in the sky has occupied American leaders and stopped them for decades. President Ronald Reagan proposed a similar plan in the early eighties of the last century called the “Star War” program by critics, which consists of space -based. Laser system to drop projectors. While the types of technologies suggested by Reagan using It was not possible At that time, they are now, as Grego says.
Montgomery says that the United States government will probably need to choose between building a new system based on space or building its wild system, because it will simply be very expensive. “If you go to this second track of the old systems now, you will inevitably separate your space financing at a later time.”
But Grejo says she believes that the space missile interception system will be weak and very practical, because it requires the use of missile objections that are carrying satellites. Since satellites will constantly move in relation to the surface of the Earth, the United States will need an astronomical amount of intersections to provide full protection.
Grejo says it only works when it is completely completed. “If you are able to dismantle this constellation and holes in using anti -race weapons or other types of attacks on the system, this entire matter becomes useless,” she explained.
Grego adds that the space interception system is likely to cost trillion dollars between buildings, release and replace it-even given the fact that the new technology developed by Spacex has helped reduce the cost of satellite launch operations significantly in recent years. The satellites that revolve around the Earth in the orbit of the low -Earth also fall into the atmosphere and burn after about three to five years, which means that the ingredients will need to be replaced regularly.
https://media.wired.com/photos/6806a30ff65114c06e16cf2e/191:100/w_1280,c_limit/Missile-Shield-Trump-Business-1676074804.jpg
Source link