The purpose of critics is greatly misunderstood

by Robert Scotchi
| Published 3 seconds ago

Cinematic criticism and talking about the media in general are a dirty work, but not for the reason he is thinking about. The most common issue I face is the reaction of fans to opinion, as it seems that readers personally insult by the preference of another known person.

Basically, this is all that movie critics do: they prove their taste through the body of their work. The more lengthy and prolonged critic, the better the reference frame. It is up to you to liquidate your taste through what critics say. Cinema’s criticism – and all criticisms, in fact – is not a ruler, it is a measure.

The preference is created and must be considered

As of writing these lines, I have produced 1400 articles For a giant freakin robot. Most of these reviews that are presented to my self -treatment on the media that I consume. If you are new to me, you may think I am a fool because I am looking for what is called bad cinema in an endeavor never ends to find recipes for recovery that may have been ignored.

Most of the time, I am surprised by the pleasure of what I see, and I share these results with those who are interested in my evaluation. I will not call myself one of the great critics of our time, but I created my taste, and this is the entire point.

All critics work in this way. They have proverbs and hate, and they use this context to help readers understand what they might like or not like anything.

Roger Ebert was difficult, but he was fair in this context

Roger Ebert is a major example of what critics do. He devoted his life to documenting his preferences and sharing with his fans. Classic comedy lover spiral, Ebert praised films like Its girl Fridayand The child grew upand Eve’s ladyand What is the matter, document?And This happened on one night Because he moves the character, smart, and the masks are supported in a good position that serves the narration.

At the same time, he publicly punished attempts at the weakest gender, and emptying films like the biographyand French kissand Tommy BoyAnd Freddy got fingers. If you are a fan of these films, this does not mean that critics like Ebert hate you personally or think about you to find pleasure in it. Its reference frame still provides a valuable vision. If hated Tommy Boy For excessive exotic in hardness and dimmed lead, this is exactly the type of media you are looking for, then you can safely assume that it is a kind of your films based on its negative review.

It also made his praise Major Pine Very meaningful. Damon Wayans Comedy 3 of 4 -star, and wrote: “The key to this type of comedy is to walk all the way with her, and Wayans creates a comic figure of distress, obsession and blind commitment … Wayans is one of the most talented actors around her, especially when he is left and swings for animals.” Knowing EBERT contempt for modern football comedy, the fact that this Major Pine He won it says everything.

Critics still have blind points

Critics have the same blind spots for every human being. Journey Spoiled tomatoes For an appropriate evaluation for Five nights in Freddy This is proven. 33 per cent of the critical result and the 86 percent audience, you thought the auditors were moving for no reason.

Why division? Five nights in Freddy It is based on a huge accumulation of science from the video game, which is trying to adapt, that ordinary fans will not understand. Critics knocked on the film because they were loaded with Easter eggs and the references that removed the public masses.

The gaming series fans were happy to see these details on the screen. This does not make the movie good or bad; It makes it specialized. Critics did not get it, but the fans did so, and that’s all you need to know.

Use their rule To till your own opinions

The complete goal of critics who creates their preferences is to filter IP quality through their personal taste. If you know the taste of the critic well enough, you can use it to sharpen your own.

---