The only movie that the director Alfred Hitchcock was unable to complete

Legendary Alfred Hitchcock is one of the most venerable filmmakers in all ages. Hitchcock put some of the most famous scenes In the history of cinema, including the Dradatic Crop Duster chase in “North Wy Northwest” and BREADSOWER MURDER in “Psycho”. The beginning of his career in the early days of cinema, without a wealth of cinematic classics that we should look forward to for inspiration, Hitchcock was a pioneer. He developed new narrative techniques for telling stories about the film, which paves the way for generations of filmmakers to follow up.

The Hitchcock cinematic profession has extended for half a century. Some of his first roles in this industry were as a title designer or art director in other film films films, many of which have been lost since then. The first film directed by Hitchcock, which the modern fans can still enjoy, is “The Pleasure Garden” of 1925, a silent drama based in London Park Theater in London. However, “The Pleasure Garden” was actually Hitchcock. Preceded Hitchcock movie lost … or, more accurately, this has not been completed.

Hitchcock began working on “Number 13”, his first appearance in directing, in 1922. GainsBorough Pictures, a production company behind the movie, made this first opportunity to direct a feature. Although it was the project that would represent one of the most legendary professions in the cinema, the number 13 “did not reach theaters, and much about the film is still a mystery to this day.

The date of the production of “No. 13” – which is also called “Mrs. Pepodi” in studio documents – remains a point of conspiracies and uncertainty for modern filmmakers and Hitchcock lovers. One of the details that seem clear is that production has been closed due to lack of money. Whether this means that GainsBorough Pictures did not have enough belief in the film and its new director to launch the same money it is unclear. All that is really known is that “No. 13” was funded by two private people instead of private studio money.

He was the first to be the film on board John Hitchcock, the uncle of Alfred Hitchcock. The second is Clare Greet, the actor who also played one of the leading roles in “Number 13.” Although the film was never completed, Hitchcock was so grateful for GENTER to the point that he ended up throwing it in six of his other films: “The Ring”, “The Manxman” and “Murder!” And “The Man WHO Wellow to”, “Sabotage” and “Jamaica Inn”.

A greeting had appeared alongside Ernest Thessieger at “No. 13”. The two stars were scheduled to play a couple in a story about the residents of a building-funded by the real philanthropist George Foster Pepody-aimed to provide reasonable housing for low-income London residents. Anita Ross’s textual program, an employee of isington studios who claimed Hitchcock a kind of contact with him Charlie Chaplin (yes, Which – which Charlie Chaplin) When an interview with François Truvao about his famous book “Hitchcock/Truffau”. Outside this comment, though, Hitchcock rarely talks about “No. 13”. Leave it to the master of suspense to leave the rest of us hanging forever.