The North Carolina state law will require people to share their identity with social media companies

In North Carolina, legislators are considering a draft law Grant consumers more control On the data collected and sold by companies. great! Who can argue against that? But this is not all. After national trends, it will also determine the disturbing age verification requirements. Although these laws have been developed in “Save the Kids”, these laws cause more harm than their benefit.

Last month, the state members of the state, Terry Brown (D), and Elin Ciser (PBUH), presented NC personal data privacy law, Who determines six rights for the consumer in relation to personal data. Among them, people can ask to know the information collected about them, correct inaccuracy, and withdraw if companies sell their data to third parties. Some exempt information, such as healthy information protected under HIPAA. In addition, companies do not need compliance if this will reveal commercial secrets.

The bill seems to be partially affiliated with Consumer privacy law in North CarolinaWho was previously presented to the Senate in the state but died in the committee. However, Eric Nol, co -manager of the Privacy and Data Center project at the Democracy and Technology Center, told Gizmodo via e -mail that the bill is “another example of a friendly manufacturing privacy legislation” that only provides little protection due to “protection of databases to minimum (restarting the current law on safe practices) as well as very broad exemptions.”

Unlike its predecessor, this bill does not focus only on the privacy of the consumer. In the second half, it is also necessary for social media to establish “reasonable age verification methods” to prevent minors from creating accounts without permission from parents. Under the law, social media platforms must use third -party sellers to carry out this process. The approved methods include providing third parties with a driving license or any other form of identity issued by the government. There are some exceptions to this process, such as gaming sites or platforms that generate less than $ 100,000 of annual revenue.

Age verification legislation is often associated with restricting access to porn as it is with Texas 1181, which is now the center of A. The case of the Supreme Court. Last year, North Carolina has approved its porn bill called the top scorer law. However, age -spuring legislation to social media has emerged at the country level. In 2023, Arkansas passed its copyMany countries are studying bills, including MinnesotaWho actually wants to implement the unknown verification, and Pennsylvania. This year, American Senate members were also repeated Children outside the law of social media To photograph the era of social media federal.

Anyone has an ounce of awareness that would swing in this legislation. First: They will not work. It is already easy to circumvent the age on porn websites. But according to Null, checking an age is “invasive privacy”, especially when a third -party seller is required.

“The condition … no one can benefit from the exception of age verification providers,” Nol said. “Imposing such a thing is more private, because the social media company is likely to have user definitions (to) user identifiers, so they will provide service providers.”

Although most bills prevent social media platforms and/or sellers from keeping people’s information, you cannot guarantee this. Companies all the time is about the data they have or how to use it. (Which makes it somewhat paradoxes to slide age verification to a draft law that has been framing as data protection, but I go.) In addition, data violations have become Increasingly common, Which can have consequences in the real world, such as theft of identity.

Privacy advocates such as Frontier Electronic indicated that age verification legislation will Restriction in an inconsistent way Marginally marginalized societies. In the United States, millions of adults do not have or unable to obtain a government identifier. Those The most affected It includes people with low incomes, the elderly, youth and colored societies. In general, although the laws may seem to address a problem, age verification only falls in light of the usual moral panic as progress.