The new nature law tries to explain the complexity of the universe

Kaufman argues that biological development constantly creates not only new types of living organisms but new possibilities for living organisms, which were not only present in an early stage of development but could not exist. From the soup of living organisms with a single cell that formed life on Earth 3 billion years ago, it was not possible for any elephant to appear suddenly-and this requires a full set of previous and long but specific innovations.

However, there is no theoretical extent for the number of uses it has. This means that it is not possible to predict the appearance of new functions in evolution – however, some new functions can dictate the rules of how the system evolves later. “The biological ocean creates its own capabilities,” Kaufman said. “We don’t just know what will happen, but we do not even know what can happen.” Photo representation was such a deep development. Likewise, it was the real nucleus, nervous systems and language. “We need an additional set of rules that describe the development of the original rules. But this upper level of the rules itself needs to be evolve. Thus, we end with an unlimited hierarchy,” said Microscopic scientist Karl Wose and physicist Nigel Goldfield in 2011.

The physicist Paul Davis of Arizona State University agrees that biological development “generates an unpredictable, unpredictable possibility space or captured through any inevitable process from previous countries. So life is partially developing into the unknown.”

Sports, the “phase space” is a way to describe all possible configurations of the physical system, whether it is relatively simple like the ideal or complex pendulum like all atoms that include the Earth. Davis and his colleagues recently Proposal This development in the mid -phase area may be an official equivalent to “”Theories of incompleteness“Mathematics Cort Godel has created. Godelle has shown that any of the axioms in mathematics allows the formulation of data that cannot be shown to be correct or wrong. We can only decide such phrases by adding new axioms.

Davis and his colleagues say that, as with the Jodel theory, the main factor that makes biological development open and prevents us from being able to express it in a stand -alone and well -standing stage space. This is not the case for physical systems, which, even if, for example, millions of stars in a galaxy, is not self -reference.

“An increase in the complexity provides future capabilities to find new strategies that are not available to the most simple creatures.” “This is the link between biological development and the issue of non -change,” said Davis.

Is biology in particular, then, among the evolutionary processes in obtaining an open launch created by the self -reference? Hazen believes that in fact, complex perception is added to this mixture-where the system components can cause, choose, and operate experiments “in their heads”-the possibility of feedback from kidney and greater open growth. “Technological applications take us to Darwinism,” he said. The hour is made faster if the watchmaker is not blind.

Return to the bench

If Hazen and his colleagues are right in the fact that the development that includes any kind of choice inevitably increases functional information – in fact, complexity – this means that life itself, and perhaps awareness and high intelligence, is inevitable in the universe? It would contradict what some biologists thought. The prominent evolutionary biologist Ernest Maeer believes that the search for intelligence outside the Earth was convicted because the appearance of human intelligence was “completely unlikely.” After all, he said, if intelligence on a level leading to cultures and civilizations was very useful in Darwini development, how did it only grew through the tree of life as a whole?

The evolutionary point of Mayr in the jump is likely to disappear to the complexity and human intelligence, as the entire stadium turns completely. Humans have achieved the dominance of planets very quickly (for the better or worse) to the point that the issue of when will happen again become a subject of discussion.

Clarification: Irene Perez for Quanta magazine

But what about the chances of such a jump that occurs in the first place? If the right “Law of Increasing Performance Information”, it appears as if life, as soon as it exists, must become more complicated by jumps and limits. It is not necessary to rely on an event that is very unlikely.

What’s more, it seems that this increase in complexity means the emergence of new causal laws in nature, which, although they do not contradict the basic laws of physics that govern the parts of smaller components, are effectively assuming what is happening after that. It can be said that we already see this in biology: Galileo (Apocryphal) experience to drop permissible PISA tower no longer has a predictive force when the masses are not guns but live birds.