The most important land decisions are meaningless

Warning: This article contains Spoilers In the first two episodes of “Alien: Earth”.

In a suitable development for this particular privilege, the idea of individualism remains at the forefront of “alien: earth” throughout its first episodes. Noah Hawley FX series stands out as the first example of property that retracts from the big screen to TV broadcast, but it is also the latest example of “Auteur” (because there is no better word) trying their hands into this article and injecting their elegance … for the largest part, at least. Chris Evangesta also wrote in his movie in his reviewEach previous movie brought something new and new to the image. The first six films cannot be more different from each other, as they boldly hold the line against modern minds that give priority to self -reference stories and beauty above all.

This is what makes it more disappointing, for IP always about innovation on tradition, “Alien: Earth” falls into this trap with one of its most important decisions early. When the first show begins, we dealt with a new edition of the opening of the Ridley Scott’s Classic 1979 “alien”. The spacecraft that slides through the vacuum next to a cyclone alone was sufficient, which relieves us of that A completely new story about Xenomorph (and other creatures) flowing on Earth By using a little nostalgia. But then, several shots of the familiar rooms are completely free of humans, which is a microfinance of the bedroom by cooling, where the crew wakes up as they did in the original, and (terrible at all) to entertain it to photograph it in exchange for the breakfast scene full of the same intertwined bow.

However, this is from an old continuation perspective, however, it adds an insult to the injury that the full structure of this sequence has only a little logical meaning.

When will reverence turn away from classic into the sincerity of Ubaid? “Alien: Earth” tests the limits of those borders directly from the beginning, as viewers in this Prequel series threw this by defaulting on the most famous and familiar pictures of the entire distinction. We soon enlarge the interior of Uscss Maginot, described as the Weyland-Yetani ship that we soon learn to search in deep space. The complementary crew consists of blue collar workers (to some extent artificially), all of whom are keen to list their grip with the company. All this logical with regard to the show made by a fan of the first movie, and not very different from Among the fans of “Star Wars” like JJ ABRAMS more or less transformed “The Force Awakens” to a long honor for “New Hope”.

However, as this collapses in the logic of the actual narration of what the “foreigner: the land” tries to achieve it compared to “alien”. The Nostromo spacecraft, which provides the preparation of a 1979 movie, was a mining ship, of course, owned by Weyland-Yetani but it is explicitly designed to charge charging. The fact that its fatty and adult employees end up with the terrifying Xenomorph chart is completely circumstantial (in terms of conspiracy)-in an ideal version of the movie, they will never end through the LV-426 paths, and instead, they would go to their water path. So why on Earth (or outside Earth, instead) a ship like Maginot, will explore and search in deep space, also in the same aesthetics of Nostromo?

There is nothing wrong with its nature in nostalgia to nostalgia, in itself, but it definitely becomes a bigger problem when you begin to pay attention from the biggest story – or worse than that – the biggest story that is listed.

In order to be fair “foreign: the earth”, it makes a certain amount of meaning this Production from anyone else would adhere to the “foreign” style and tone. It was not identified only two years ago from the events of “Alien”, and there is definitely an objective argument that must be a cold and spiritual company like Weyland-Yetani that will produce its revolutions-regardless of its actual goal. After all, what is the best way to confirm The idea of traditional privilege on capitalism crushes humanity to the bone so that there is nothing remaining By applying one approach that suits everyone on their extensive cosmic empire? In another version, better than this offer, the writing team could have done this accurate comment. However, based on the first two episodes of the series, there is few supportive evidence that this is already the case.

The most frustrated is that Ridley Scott, among all people, has already shown us the way forward with “Prometheus” and “Foreign: Covenant.” Fandom’s anger has attracted a lot of firm divergence of the firm tone and original picturesIf you remember, but this was the point completely. Scott decided to use the popular concession integrity to tell a story that is completely different from ideas with a high horizon about the origins of our gender, human ego, and the devastating consequences of uncontrolled ambition. To reflect this, he had copied these films (but especially “Prometheus”) with very specific characters-not equivalent to space manufacturers, as “Alien” focuses on an unimaginable way, but scientific minds are exaggerated on glossy technology and amenities for the wealthy. The stagnant corridors have been given the lovecraftian in Nostromo and LV-426, which are replaced by a clean and artificially sterile spacecraft boundaries.

Scott realized that the various job needs require a different formal approach, but the same cannot be said to “Alien: Earth” – at least in the early episodes. There is still time for the rest of the season to change hearts and minds, and win even the biggest skeptics. New episodes from “Alien: Earth” stream on FX and Hulu every Tuesday.