The Ministry of Justice ascends the dispute with Federal Judge James Boasberg due to misconduct

On Monday, the Ministry of Justice accused the American provincial judge, James Boasberg, of misconduct, and escalating Trump administration Long -term hostility against federal judges who prevented or stopped some of the most severe policy priorities for the president.

The complaint, which was reviewed by Fox News Digital, focuses on notes, claimed that Boasberg made during a meeting on March 11 of the United States Judicial Conference – the National Policy Manufacturing Authority for Federal Courts, which meets twice a year and heads it supreme court Judge John Roberts.

During that meeting, the complaint says, Boasberg tried “incorrectly influencing the president of Judges Roberts” and about twenty federal judges at the conference by noting that the Trump administration can “ignore the rulings of federal courts” and raises a “constitutional crisis”.

The complaint was sent towards the American Prosecutor Bam Bondi and signed by its chief of staff, Chad Mizal.

The Court of Appeal prevents Trump’s deportation trips, the supervisor of the immigration lawsuit for foreign enemies

Fox News Digital was unable to independently verify the reported Boasberg notes at the March 11 meeting, and his office did not immediately respond to the request for comment.

The officials argued that the notes reported were an attempt Incorrectly bias or influence Roberts said they “undermine the safety and transfer of the federal judiciary.”

I asked for a complaint, not for the first time, to remove boasberg from JGG V head. Trumpand A lawsuit filed in March by the American Civil Liberties Union attorneys and others on behalf of hundreds of migrants who were briefly deported to Al -Salvador Prison in Sequot Prison under the auspices of the War Migration Law.

Certainly the complaint – and its request to remove boasberg from the most migration issue of President Donald Trump – is to test the risky relationship between administration and courts.

Since Trump’s inauguration in January, senior administration officials have imprisoned dozens of so -called “activist” judges who have banned or stopped some of Trump’s comprehensive executive orders from the forces.

It is worth noting that Trump’s legal group founded by White House assistant Stephen Miller tried to sue Roberts earlier this year because of his role in supervising The American Judicial Conference, In a legal attempt in a long -term legal presentation until the group’s actions exceeded what they claim to be “basic functions” of the judiciary.

Boasberg, in particular, has emerged as one of the largest Trump’s general opponents. On March 15, several days after the observations included in the complaint of the Ministry of Justice, Boasberg issued a temporary order for restriction that seeks to prevent Trump’s use of the Immigration Law in the era of war 1798, the law of foreign enemies, to a summary. The deportation of hundreds of Venezuelan citizens To El Salvador.

Trump’s alignment group sue John Roberts, in an attempt to restrict court authority

Boasberg commanded that all the aircraft allocated to El Salvador “immediately” have returned to the American soil, which did not happen, and then, ordered a new investigation to determine whether the Trump administration had complied with his orders. In April, he ruled that the court had reasons to apply for possible contempt procedures, although this ruling remained by a higher appeal court, which has not yet considered the matter.

His command was affected on March 15th with a complex legal epic that eventually born dozens of court challenges related to deportation throughout the country-although those that were presented before Boasberg were the first-and later the Supreme Court pushed to power, on two separate occasions, that the accelerating removal had violated the protection of the obligatory migrants under due procedures. US constitution.

100 days of restraining orders and trials and “Teflon Don”: Trump wears the second period of its largest tests in court

However, Boasberg also placed directly at the intersection of Trump officials – including the president – as the administration moved to shoot executive orders and the targeted judges who tried to prevent them.

Their attacks were closely focused on the behavior of many judges-but no one more than Boasberg, Obama, who was originally exploited by President George W. Bush in 2002 to be a judge participating in the Colombia Supreme Provincial Court.

White House press secretary Caroline Levit has repeatedly used a platform for her this year to pick up “radical left -wing judges”, accusing them of overcoming their authority and undermining the presidential authorities.

Trump suggested earlier this year that Boasberg could be isolated from his actions, describing the judge as “rioters and incitement” – and pushed a rare general reprimand from Judge Roberts.

For some, it seems that the complaint was good timing: Boasberg ordered the Ministry of Justice and ACLU in the court to attend a hearing of the situation last week to determine the 252 CECOT status who were deported to Venezuela from El Salvador as part of the exchange of prisoners with Venezuelan President Nicholas Maduro.

Gorsuch, Roberts team with the Left Supreme Court judges in the migration ruling

Boasberg ended the session through the administration’s order and the American Civil Liberties Union’s lawyers to submit a joint update to the court on Thursday, August 7, and to continue doing this every two weeks after that, as the options that the court must order.

When asked in a court hearing in the court last week whether the Ministry of Justice would consider the courts’ orders, the lawyer of the Ministry of Justice, Tiberius Davis, said they would do, “if this is legal.”

Davis added that the Ministry of Justice is likely to seek an appeal from a Supreme Court.

It is worth noting that this is not the first time that the Trump administration has tried to remove Boasburg from overseeing the case.

In March, the Ministry of Justice asked the Court of Appeal in the Capital Department to remove the judge in Spears from the presidency of the case of the Law of the Foreign Enemies and has been re -appointed to another federal judge. The Court of Appeal has not taken any action in response to the request.

The shelters, Jesus, and Miss Back Man: The American judge roams the Ministry of Justice on the transit policy in a set of amazing questions

The White House has repeatedly argued that the minimum court judges like Boasberg should not have the authority to prevent what the legal president’s agenda calls – although the judges say Trump’s actions violate the law.

Click here to get the Fox News app

However, the first six months of Trump’s second state were distinguished by the repeated suspect of the court, as the administration goes forward in its business schedule and target those who are on its way.

This feeling was repeated by the former Acting Director and the current CZAR TOM HONAN. “I do not care what the judges think. He said earlier this year in an interview:“ I do not care about what the left thinks. We are coming. Another battle. every day.”