The Minister of Immigration, Lina Mettelig Diab, is defending the new controversial measures in the strong border law, such as granting its office the authority to cancel immigration documents collectively and set time limits for asylum seekers to submit their requests.
“There are a lot of applications in the system. We need to act fairly, and to treat people appropriately who really need to demand asylum and those who really need to protect them to stay in Canada,” Diab told CBC News.
“We need to be more efficient in doing this. At the same time, Canadians are asking to have a system that works for everyone.”
What is meant by the House of Commons on Tuesday, and the strong border law aims to protect Canadian sovereignty, enhance borders and preserve the safety of Canadians, according to the federal government.
The bill would make dozens of amendments to the current laws. The proposed changes in the Immigration Protection and Refugee Protection Law will force asylum seekers who enter the country, including temporary students and residents, to submit claims within a year.
The new law will also require that the law be charged irregular, the people who enter Canada between the official entry ports, to submit an asylum demand within 14 days of reaching Canada.
The voluntary departure will speed up by making removal orders effective on the same day when the asylum claim is withdrawn.
Groups such as the Canadian Refugee Attorney Association raises concerns about these measures.
“There are some groups of people who may end up to make a claim after they were in Canada for more than a year for completely legitimate reasons,” said Adam Sadinsky, the group’s co -chair of the group.
He referred to examples such as changes in the government in a country of origin, or the outbreak of conflict or calling for human rights in Canada.
“They may now be at risk of returning home in a way that was not when they arrived for the first time,” he said.
Federal government data shows about 39,445 demands to seek to treat it through immigration, refugees and citizenship in Canada and the Canadian Border Services Agency Between January and April.
Sadinsky said if the government’s motives revolve around the cleansing of accumulated actions, it may create another problem.
Resorters who find their request can be rejected by the Immigration Council and Refugees in Canada submitting an appeal to the Refugee Appeals Section. However, its closure outside the way of asylum after a year can make them resort to the Federal Court of Canada to resort instead, a The body that was general About the halls of its halls facing severe delays with immigration issues.
Sadinsky said: “It is a much more work for the court, when people start obtaining the removal dates from Canada and they must ask the court requests for residence from Canada,” Sadinsky said.
Sadinsky suggested that the government may have reduced accumulated actions by issuing comprehensive approvals for potential asylum seekers from countries where Canada realizes that there is an imminent danger to re -send them, such as the Taliban -controlled Afghanistan.
The Minister of Public Safety, Gary Anandasangi, said that the C-2 bill, which is the strong border law, “will keep our borders safe, combat organized crime over patriotism, stop the flow of illegal fentanel and land laundering, as well as” enhancing the integrity and integrity of our immigration system. ”
Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Justice Minister Sean Fraser said that the government needed to act, although he admitted that the courts were facing efficiency problems.
“We must be able to do two things at the same time.”
The comment was reached, the office of the President of the Supreme Court at the Federal Court said in a statement that he “is simply hoped that any possible impact on the burden of the court’s work will take into account,” noting a previous amendment to the Immigration Law during the era of Stephen Harper Governorate in 2010, which included four new court positions.
Block cancel
The Immigrant Rights Network, a group of advocacy, said it is concerned that the government gives itself the ability to cancel the previously released immigration documents in large groups.
“What is this is the creation of a mass deportation machine,” said Sayed Hosan. “Just go out and say that we are walking away from the Geneva Convention.”
Diab said that any decisions to cancel the bloc will be taken by the entire cabinet, not only its office, and it will not be underestimated.
“This is in exceptional circumstances, when you talk about canceling the mass or commenting,” she said.
“For example, when Covid happened, we literally had upcoming applications, and the system had no salad to suspend or cancel these applications … we can face health risks again. We may have security risks.”
The C-2 draft law is now moving through Parliament. The legislation is usually studied by the upcoming parliamentary committee, although it is not possible for the DIAB or Gary Anandasangare, the Minister of Public Safety, can say the committee that it will receive.
The committees have not yet been named for this sitting, and it is not clear whether it will start before Parliament in the summer at the end of June.
The Canadian League said to the refugee lawyer that it intends to write a letter that defines its concerns to the federal government, and hopes to present it in the committee when the moment arrives.
https://i.cbc.ca/1.7553245.1749142971!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_1180/que-asylum-seekers-20170821.jpg?im=Resize%3D620
Source link