Although he was against the introduction of video stations for gambling in Chicago, the mayor, Brandon Johnson, failed to persuade a committee not to cancel the law. Video stationsOr referred to as “video games” by some participants in the session, can be virtual openings, poker or other interactive games.
Anthony Bell, the critic of the mayor and the dean of the city council, said it will actually be a “tax tax”. He claims that he can bring between 60 to 100 million dollars annually to the state if gambling machines are allowed to fill sites. Talk to Crane Chicago works Paper, Bell said:
“It is better … than to hit people who have taxes, fines and drawings. Quick camera tickets and such things. This is something that a person should choose; they have to want to go.”
General comments and companies on banning the video station in Chicago
While some companies and officials opposed the idea, there were those who sat alongside approval. during General suspension session for 30 minutesThe components and actors were limited to three minutes to present their case. Sam Toya, who represents the Illinois Restaurants Association, supported this step to present video stations:
“It is a fixed revenue generator. In fact, we support all convincing electronic devices.”
It claims that the introduction of these machines in the industry would flow brick and shells with another possible revenue flow. This comes at a time when the restaurant industry is on its background, after birth, and in the midst of the continuous cost crisis.
One of the speakers, against the decree, said that he did not support him unless the city owns the machines that are offered. Its logic was that if the city owned it, it would include that all revenues go to the city and give a flow to public services.
The administrative director of the Chicago Hospitality Association also spoke Duer. It indicates that the licenses that open the bars have decreased since 2020, and it has decreased significantly since 2012. The main point in Duwair was a guarantee that “bars”, as shown in the law, had not been excluded from the initiative.
The director stated that the introduction of these machines in places will not affect known gambling works such as the casino, which DOERR uses as an example of how to rely on the city’s internal companies on their success to “support” different costs.
Johnson is said to be not interested in supporting the idea, unless the city will receive more taxes. Currently, Chicago has not changed anything at this level.
Distinctive image: Wikikomons, IGT
Pamphlet The mayor of Chicago loses a big as the committee votes to cancel the video station First appear on reading.
[og_img]
Source link